Ruth Condray
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stuart R. SteinhauerGreg J. SiegleMisha PlessAnnette KasparekDaniël P. van KammenLisa A. MorrowMatcheri S. KeshavanJonathan D. Cohen
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (8 papers)Language Development and Disorders (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Ruth Condray
40 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Cognitive Neuroscience 790
- Psychiatry and Mental health 446
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 200
- Clinical Psychology 178
- Social Psychology 144
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Condray
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Condray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Condray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Condray more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Condray
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Condray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Condray. The network helps show where Ruth Condray may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Condray
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Condray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Condray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Condray. Ruth Condray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 73 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 339 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 68 | |
| 10 | 74 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 80 | |
| 14 | 67 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 63 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Ruth Condray
Ruth Condray is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (8 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (104 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (790 citations) and Chemical Health and Safety (21 citations). Ruth Condray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Stuart R. Steinhauer, Greg J. Siegle, Misha Pless, Annette Kasparek, Daniël P. van Kammen, Lisa A. Morrow, Matcheri S. Keshavan, Jonathan D. Cohen, Jeffrey Yao and George G. Dougherty. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.