C. G. Peterson

4.2k total citations
67 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

C. G. Peterson is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, C. G. Peterson has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 39 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 11 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in C. G. Peterson's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (46 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (27 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (17 papers). C. G. Peterson is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (46 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (27 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (17 papers). C. G. Peterson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Czechia. C. G. Peterson's co-authors include Richard Hughes, J. E. Nordholt, G. L. Morgan, Paul G. Kwiat, W. T. Buttler, S. K. Lamoreaux, A. G. White, Devang Naik, Andrew J. Berglund and Philip A. Hiskett and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Physical Review A.

In The Last Decade

C. G. Peterson

63 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. G. Peterson United States 22 2.1k 2.0k 482 91 74 67 2.5k
H. Weier Germany 12 1.9k 0.9× 1.9k 0.9× 368 0.8× 104 1.1× 53 0.7× 18 2.2k
Miloslav Dušek Czechia 19 3.2k 1.5× 2.7k 1.4× 411 0.9× 80 0.9× 54 0.7× 61 3.4k
J. E. Nordholt United States 19 1.6k 0.7× 1.5k 0.7× 453 0.9× 80 0.9× 54 0.7× 72 2.0k
Kiyoshi Tamaki Japan 30 3.6k 1.7× 3.3k 1.7× 604 1.3× 146 1.6× 146 2.0× 68 4.1k
Andreas Poppe Austria 23 1.5k 0.7× 2.1k 1.0× 867 1.8× 110 1.2× 23 0.3× 76 2.6k
J.H. Shapiro United States 18 1.7k 0.8× 1.9k 1.0× 741 1.5× 96 1.1× 98 1.3× 46 2.5k
Charles Ci Wen Lim Singapore 24 2.5k 1.2× 2.3k 1.2× 307 0.6× 46 0.5× 69 0.9× 71 2.8k
T. Schmitt-Manderbach Germany 10 1.7k 0.8× 1.6k 0.8× 317 0.7× 96 1.1× 39 0.5× 14 1.9k
Eleni Diamanti France 27 3.1k 1.4× 2.8k 1.4× 718 1.5× 86 0.9× 184 2.5× 104 3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by C. G. Peterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. G. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. G. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. G. Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. G. Peterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. G. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. G. Peterson. The network helps show where C. G. Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. G. Peterson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. G. Peterson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. G. Peterson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. G. Peterson. C. G. Peterson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Love, Steven P., James Theiler, Bernard R. Foy, et al.. (2018). High-Resolution Hyperspectral Imaging of Dilute Gases from CubeSat Platforms. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2018. 3 indexed citations
2.
Hughes, Richard, J. E. Nordholt, Kevin McCabe, et al.. (2013). Network-Centric Quantum Communications. FW2C.1–FW2C.1. 13 indexed citations
3.
Rosenberg, Danna, Jim Harrington, Patrick R. Rice, et al.. (2007). Long-Distance Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution in Optical Fiber. Physical Review Letters. 98(1). 10503–10503. 243 indexed citations
4.
Runser, R.J., T.E. Chapuran, P. Toliver, et al.. (2007). Progress toward quantum communications networks: opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6476. 64760I–64760I. 18 indexed citations
5.
Runser, R.J., T.E. Chapuran, P. Toliver, et al.. (2006). Quantum Key Distribution for Reconfigurable Optical Networks. Optical Fiber Communication Conference. 2 indexed citations
6.
Hughes, Richard, T.E. Chapuran, Nicholas Dallmann, et al.. (2005). A quantum key distribution system for optical fiber networks. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5893. 589301–589301. 7 indexed citations
7.
Marchewka, Jack T., Liu Chang, & C. G. Peterson. (2003). Perceptions of unsolicited electronic mail or spam. CSUSB ScholarWorks (California State University, San Bernardino). 12(1). 6. 10 indexed citations
8.
Hughes, Richard, J. E. Nordholt, G. L. Morgan, & C. G. Peterson. (2003). Free space quantum key distribution in daylight. 266–266. 1 indexed citations
9.
Buttler, W. T., Richard Hughes, Paul G. Kwiat, et al.. (2002). Practical quantum cryptography in free space. 89–90.
10.
Hughes, Richard, W. T. Buttler, Paul G. Kwiat, et al.. (2000). Free-space quantum cryptography in daylight. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 3932. 117–126. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hughes, Richard, W. T. Buttler, Paul G. Kwiat, et al.. (2000). <title>Free-space quantum cryptography in daylight</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3932. 117–126. 4 indexed citations
12.
Hughes, Richard, G. L. Morgan, & C. G. Peterson. (2000). Quantum key distribution over a 48km optical fibre network. Journal of Modern Optics. 47(2-3). 533–547. 35 indexed citations
13.
Enzer, Daphna G., Martin Schauer, J.J. Gómez, et al.. (2000). Observation of Power-Law Scaling for Phase Transitions in Linear Trapped Ion Crystals. Physical Review Letters. 85(12). 2466–2469. 54 indexed citations
14.
Buttler, W. T., Richard Hughes, Paul G. Kwiat, et al.. (1999). Buttleret al.Reply:. Physical Review Letters. 83(12). 2477–2477. 3 indexed citations
15.
James, Daniel F. V., M. S. Gulley, M. H. Holzscheiter, et al.. (1999). Trapped Ion Quantum Computer Research at Los Alamos. Lecture notes in computer science. 1509. 426–437. 1 indexed citations
16.
Hughes, Richard, Daniel F. V. James, J.J. Gómez, et al.. (1998). The Los Alamos Trapped Ion Quantum Computer Experiment. Fortschritte der Physik. 46(4-5). 329–361. 45 indexed citations
17.
Oertel, J. A., et al.. (1997). <title>Dual microchannel plate module for a gated monochromatic x-ray imager</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1 indexed citations
18.
Oertel, J. A., Thomas Archuleta, C. G. Peterson, & F. J. Marshall. (1997). Dual microchannel plate module for a gated monochromatic x-ray imager. Review of Scientific Instruments. 68(1). 789–791. 11 indexed citations
19.
Peterson, C. G. & Nancy E. Miller. (1985). Open lab vs. closed lab. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 17(1). 78–81. 3 indexed citations
20.
Cammarata, Arthur, et al.. (1974). The Computerized Pharmacist: A Dispensing Program Written in Fortran. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 38(2). 153–160.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. Weier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Miloslav Dušek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. E. Nordholt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kiyoshi Tamaki Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andreas Poppe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J.H. Shapiro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charles Ci Wen Lim Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Schmitt-Manderbach Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eleni Diamanti
Rankless by CCL
2026