C. Duke

58 papers receiving 973 citations

Peers

C. Duke
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Family Practice 34
  • Pharmacy 66
  • Epidemiology 415
  • General Health Professions 287
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 308
Replace Stephen J. Spann with:
Stephen J. Spann United States
Salman Yousuf Guraya United Arab Emirates
Joy H. Lewis United States
Sarah Jewell United States
Sian K. Smith Australia
Sarah C. Kobrin United States
Jane Richardson United Kingdom
Katharine A. Rendle United States
Antonio P. DeRosa United States
Lesley McGregor United Kingdom
C. Duke relative to Stephen J. Spann United States Stephen J. Spann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Stephen J. Spann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Duke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Duke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Duke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Duke. The network helps show where C. Duke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Duke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Duke Line = papers co-authored together C. Duke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006112
2 2014111
3 200386
4 202165
5 199958
6 201555
7
Managing the Learning University
199254
8 201650
9 201649
10 201936
11 200134
12 202125
13
Rebalancing the Social and Economic: Learning Partnership and Place
200522
14 202117
15 201417
16 201916
17 201616
18
The new occlutech duct occluder: immediate results, procedural challenges, and short-term follow-up.
201516
19 200114
20 200514

About C. Duke

C. Duke is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (15 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (9 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (8 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Education Systems and Policy (7 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (5 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (34 citations), Pharmacy (66 citations), Epidemiology (415 citations), General Health Professions (287 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (308 citations). C. Duke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Fox, Shakeel A. Qureshi, Éric Rosenthal, Marion Danis, Anita J. Tarzian, Kak‐Chen Chan, David Hildick‐Smith, Michael Mullen, W. Stewart Hillis and W.L. Morrison. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Bioethics, Heart, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, AJOB Empirical Bioethics and Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact