C. D. Stansbury

431 citations
9 papers · 325 indexed · h-index 8

C. D. Stansbury

9 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

C. D. Stansbury
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 206
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 158
  • Ecological Modeling 28
  • Insect Science 63
  • Plant Science 159
Replace Shan‐Huah Wu with:
Shan‐Huah Wu Taiwan
Julissa Rojas‐Sandoval Puerto Rico
Isgard Lemke Germany
José Miguel Costa Portugal
J. G. Virtue
R. L. Kluge South Africa
Guy Vranckx Belgium
Stephen J. Harvey United States
Steve Schoenig United States
Jessica D. Stephens United States
C. D. Stansbury relative to Shan‐Huah Wu Taiwan Shan‐Huah Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Shan‐Huah Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. D. Stansbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. D. Stansbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. D. Stansbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. D. Stansbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. D. Stansbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. D. Stansbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. D. Stansbury. The network helps show where C. D. Stansbury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside C. D. Stansbury, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. D. Stansbury Line = papers co-authored together C. D. Stansbury links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 20079
2 2005205
3 200229
4
200214
5 200136
6 200111
7 19998
8
Invasion Criteria for the Environmental Weed Bridal Creeper, Asparagus asparagoides (L.) Wight, in South-West Australia
19992
9
Observations of birds feeding on bridal creeper (Asparagus asparagoides) fruits within Yanchep National Park, Western Australia.
199611

About C. D. Stansbury

C. D. Stansbury is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Ecological Modeling, having authored 9 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (3 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (206 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (158 citations) and Ecological Modeling (28 citations). C. D. Stansbury has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Carl R. Gosper, Gabrielle Vivian‐Smith, Simon McKirdy, Art Diggle, I. T. Riley, Z. A. Pretorius, J. K. Scott, G. J. Keighery, T. L. Woodburn and L. Morin. Their work appears in journals such as Phytopathology, Diversity and Distributions and Weed Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026