C. D. Broad

2.8k citations
25 papers · 347 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

C. D. Broad

21 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

C. D. Broad
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Philosophy 155
  • History and Philosophy of Science 63
  • General Psychology 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 75
  • General Decision Sciences 10
Replace Patrick K Bastable with:
Patrick K Bastable
Charles A. Fritz
C. J. Ducasse United States
Evan Fales United States
Bruce Aune United States
Raziel Abelson United States
David Pears United Kingdom
Berent Enç United States
Kathleen V. Wilkes United States
Gustav Bergmann United States
C. D. Broad relative to Patrick K Bastable Patrick K Bastable's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Patrick K Bastable · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. D. Broad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. D. Broad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. D. Broad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. D. Broad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. D. Broad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. D. Broad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. D. Broad. The network helps show where C. D. Broad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside C. D. Broad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. D. Broad Line = papers co-authored together C. D. Broad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195355
2 195448
3 195445
4 195435
5
Kant, An Introduction
197826
6 196526
7 195420
8 195219
9
Broad's critical essays in moral philosophy
197119
10 196219
11 19688
12
Scientific Thought: A Philosophical Analysis of some of its fundamental concepts
20016
13 19513
14 19513
15
the Philosophy of C. D. Broad
19593
16
Berkeley's argument about material substance
19752
17 20112
18
Religion, Philosophy and Psychical Research: Selected Essays
20002
19 19582
20 19591

About C. D. Broad

C. D. Broad is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Law and Archeology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (155 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (63 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 citations) and General Decision Sciences (10 citations). C. D. Broad has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. J. Paton, C. J. Ducasse, Albert A. Ehrenzweig, Barna Horvath, Karl Olivecrona and Edwin N. Garlan. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy, Mind, The Philosophical Review and Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact