C. C. Bowling
- Plant Science top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Dave MorrisS. Y. ZhangWillard H. CarmeanMichael T. Ter‐MikaelianChander ShahiMathew LeitchMichael DrescherAjith H. Perera
- Topics
- Insect Pest Control Strategies (11 papers)Insect behavior and control techniques (11 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceNature and Landscape ConservationEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of Forest ResearchJournal of Economic EntomologyAnnals of the Entomological Society of America
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
C. C. Bowling
35 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Plant Science 198
- Insect Science 168
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 108
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 74
- Molecular Biology 68
Countries citing papers authored by C. C. Bowling
This map shows the geographic impact of C. C. Bowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. C. Bowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. C. Bowling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. C. Bowling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. C. Bowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. C. Bowling. The network helps show where C. C. Bowling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. C. Bowling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. C. Bowling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. C. Bowling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. C. Bowling. C. C. Bowling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Boreal forest succession in Ontario: an analysis of the knowledge space. | 1 |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About C. C. Bowling
C. C. Bowling is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (11 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (11 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (168 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (74 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (108 citations). C. C. Bowling has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dave Morris, S. Y. Zhang, Willard H. Carmean, Michael T. Ter‐Mikaelian, Chander Shahi, Mathew Leitch, Michael Drescher, Ajith H. Perera and Lisa J. Buse. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Journal of Economic Entomology and Annals of the Entomological Society of America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.