C Baum

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 889 citations indexed

About

C Baum is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Immunology. According to data from OpenAlex, C Baum has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 889 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Immunology. Recurrent topics in C Baum's work include Virus-based gene therapy research (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). C Baum is often cited by papers focused on Virus-based gene therapy research (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). C Baum collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United States. C Baum's co-authors include I L Weissman, Atsushi Tsukamoto, Ashley M. Buckle, Bruno Péault, Wolfram Ostertag, William F. Hood, Barbara K. Klein, Nicholas R. Staten, M. C. Abrams and James W. Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Therapy and Leukemia.

In The Last Decade

C Baum

6 papers receiving 843 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Isolation of a candidate human hematopoietic stem-cell population.

1992 804 citations C Baum, I L Weissman et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C Baum Germany	5	443	326	295	233	176	7	889
R Kay Canada	8	373 0.8×	366 1.1×	378 1.3×	200 0.9×	232 1.3×	10	994
Johanne D. Cashman Canada	13	591 1.3×	230 0.7×	294 1.0×	273 1.2×	209 1.2×	16	869
MI Collector United States	9	478 1.1×	344 1.1×	261 0.9×	282 1.2×	202 1.1×	10	976
Libuse Jerabek United States	15	378 0.9×	311 1.0×	398 1.3×	155 0.7×	154 0.9×	20	921
Charlotte Brovall United States	7	525 1.2×	311 1.0×	356 1.2×	202 0.9×	193 1.1×	10	1.1k
Michael Punzel Germany	19	537 1.2×	321 1.0×	477 1.6×	198 0.8×	191 1.1×	30	1.1k
GM Crooks United States	8	611 1.4×	406 1.2×	410 1.4×	228 1.0×	217 1.2×	12	1.1k
RB Crittenden United States	10	364 0.8×	193 0.6×	205 0.7×	166 0.7×	137 0.8×	14	652
RA Briddell United States	10	743 1.7×	204 0.6×	351 1.2×	231 1.0×	175 1.0×	12	985
RJ Berenson United States	10	870 2.0×	286 0.9×	381 1.3×	253 1.1×	317 1.8×	16	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by C Baum

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C Baum

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Baum. The network helps show where C Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C Baum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C Baum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C Baum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C Baum. C Baum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Baum, C. (2003). Chance or necessity? Insertional Mutagenesis in Gene Therapy and Its Consequences. Molecular Therapy. 9 indexed citations

2.

Li, Z, Boris Fehse, Bernhard Schiedlmeier, et al.. (2002). Persisting multilineage transgene expression in the clonal progeny of a hematopoietic stem cell. Leukemia. 16(9). 1655–1663. 20 indexed citations

3.

Baum, C, Anke Richters, & Wolfram Ostertag. (1999). Retroviral vector-mediated gene expression in hematopoietic cells.. PubMed. 1(5). 605–12. 9 indexed citations

4.

Thomas, James W., C Baum, William F. Hood, et al.. (1995). Potent interleukin 3 receptor agonist with selectively enhanced hematopoietic activity relative to recombinant human interleukin 3.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 92(9). 3779–3783. 46 indexed citations

5.

Péault, Bruno, C Baum, & Irving L. Weissman. (1993). CHARACTERIZATION AND PURIFICATION OF CANDIDATE MOUSE AND HUMAN HEMATOPOIETIC STEM-CELLS.

6.

Baum, C, I L Weissman, Atsushi Tsukamoto, Ashley M. Buckle, & Bruno Péault. (1992). Isolation of a candidate human hematopoietic stem-cell population.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 89(7). 2804–2808. 804 indexed citations breakdown →

7.

Péault, Bruno, et al.. (1991). IDENTIFICATION OF A NOVEL RARE, HUMAN BONE-MARROW POPULATION WITH HEMATOPOIETIC STEM-CELL ACTIVITY .2. INVIVO STUDIES IN IMMUNODEFICIENT SCID MICE ENGRAFTED WITH HUMAN BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS. Experimental Hematology. 19(6). 468–468. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact