C Baum

1.2k citations
7 papers · 889 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

C Baum

6 papers receiving 843 citations

Hit Papers

Isolation of a candidate human hematopoietic stem-cell po...8041992202620032014250500750

Peers

C Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Hematology 443
  • Genetics 233
  • Immunology 295
  • Oncology 176
  • Molecular Biology 326
Replace GM Crooks with:
GM Crooks United States
Libuse Jerabek United States
S Grigsby United States
Christie M. Traycoff United States
R Kay Canada
Erika A. de Wynter United Kingdom
GJ Spangrude United States
DM Bodine United States
Charlotte Brovall United States
Michael Punzel Germany
C Baum relative to GM Crooks United States GM Crooks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
GM Crooks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Baum. The network helps show where C Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside C Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C Baum Line = papers co-authored together C Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 20039
2 200220
3
Retroviral vector-mediated gene expression in hematopoietic cells.
19999
4 199546
5
CHARACTERIZATION AND PURIFICATION OF CANDIDATE MOUSE AND HUMAN HEMATOPOIETIC STEM-CELLS
19930
6
Isolation of a candidate human hematopoietic stem-cell population.breakdown →
1992804
7
IDENTIFICATION OF A NOVEL RARE, HUMAN BONE-MARROW POPULATION WITH HEMATOPOIETIC STEM-CELL ACTIVITY .2. INVIVO STUDIES IN IMMUNODEFICIENT SCID MICE ENGRAFTED WITH HUMAN BLOOD-FORMING ORGANS
19911

About C Baum

C Baum is a scholar working on Genetics, Immunology, Hematology, Molecular Biology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 7 papers that have together received 889 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (1 paper), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (1 paper) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (443 citations), Genetics (233 citations), Immunology (295 citations), Oncology (176 citations) and Molecular Biology (326 citations). C Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Atsushi Tsukamoto, I L Weissman, Bruno Péault, Ashley M. Buckle, Wolfram Ostertag, William F. Hood, John P. McKearn, Nicholas R. Staten, James W. Thomas and Barbara K. Klein. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Leukemia, Molecular Therapy, Experimental Hematology and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026