Byron Hawk

423 total citations
12 papers, 148 citations indexed

About

Byron Hawk is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Byron Hawk has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 148 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Communication, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Byron Hawk's work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (2 papers) and Music Technology and Sound Studies (1 paper). Byron Hawk is often cited by papers focused on Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (2 papers) and Music Technology and Sound Studies (1 paper). Byron Hawk collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Canada. Byron Hawk's co-authors include Jessica Enoch, Nathaniel A. Rivers, John Ackerman, Laurie E. Gries, Caroline Gottschalk Druschke, Thomas Rickert, Lynn Z. Bloom, David M. Grant, Kristin L. Arola and Edward M. White and has published in prestigious journals such as College English, Technical Communication Quarterly and Rhetoric Society Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Byron Hawk

11 papers receiving 114 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Byron Hawk United States	7	55	45	42	26	26	12	148
Nathaniel A. Rivers United States	8	66 1.2×	55 1.2×	59 1.4×	31 1.2×	31 1.2×	22	182
Graciela Reyes Chile	8	31 0.6×	56 1.2×	39 0.9×	7 0.3×	33 1.3×	27	251
Esperanza Morales-López Spain	8	20 0.4×	31 0.7×	56 1.3×	20 0.8×	19 0.7×	36	159
Georgina Kleege United States	9	34 0.6×	10 0.2×	48 1.1×	20 0.8×	6 0.2×	26	199
Jørgen Dines Johansen Denmark	7	59 1.1×	35 0.8×	31 0.7×	9 0.3×	21 0.8×	27	174
Ernest W.B. Hess-Lüttich Switzerland	8	55 1.0×	17 0.4×	26 0.6×	15 0.6×	22 0.8×	46	185
Kristie S. Fleckenstein United States	8	54 1.0×	14 0.3×	39 0.9×	7 0.3×	12 0.5×	24	156
Monique Lebrun Canada	9	61 1.1×	67 1.5×	73 1.7×	4 0.2×	6 0.2×	52	241
Malea Powell United States	6	60 1.1×	44 1.0×	50 1.2×	4 0.2×	13 0.5×	10	172
Carmen López Ferrero Spain	7	87 1.6×	28 0.6×	30 0.7×	5 0.2×	33 1.3×	50	222

Countries citing papers authored by Byron Hawk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Byron Hawk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Byron Hawk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Byron Hawk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Byron Hawk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Byron Hawk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Byron Hawk. The network helps show where Byron Hawk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Byron Hawk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Byron Hawk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Byron Hawk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Byron Hawk. Byron Hawk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Gries, Laurie E., Caroline Gottschalk Druschke, Nathaniel A. Rivers, et al.. (2022). Rhetorical New Materialisms (RNM). Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 52(2). 137–202. 4 indexed citations

2.

Hawk, Byron. (2018). Resounding the Rhetorical: Composition as a Quasi-Object. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 2 indexed citations

3.

Hawk, Byron. (2018). Resounding the Rhetorical. University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks. 10 indexed citations

4.

Hawk, Byron. (2018). Sound: Resonance as Rhetorical. Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 48(3). 315–323. 13 indexed citations

5.

Bloom, Lynn Z., Edward M. White, Jessica Enoch, & Byron Hawk. (2013). Symposium: What Is College English?. College English. 75(4). 420–446. 1 indexed citations

6.

Hawk, Byron, et al.. (2009). Posthuman Rhetorics and Technical Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly. 19(1). 1–10. 40 indexed citations

7.

Hawk, Byron, et al.. (2008). Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 9 indexed citations

8.

Hawk, Byron. (2007). A Counter-History of Composition: Toward Methodologies of Complexity. University of Pittsburgh Digital Library. 27 indexed citations

9.

Hawk, Byron. (2007). A Counter-History of Composition. University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks. 20 indexed citations

10.

Hawk, Byron. (2004). Toward a Post-Techne-Or, Inventing Pedagogies for Professional Writing. Technical Communication Quarterly. 13(4). 371–392. 19 indexed citations

11.

Hawk, Byron. (2003). A Rhetoric/Pedagogy of Silences: Sub-version in Paul Kameen's Writing/Teaching. Pedagogy Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture. 3(3). 377–398. 2 indexed citations

12.

Hawk, Byron, et al.. (2002). Toward a Post(human) Techne. Technical Communication Quarterly. 11(2). 234–236. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact