Brita Pekarsky
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Surgery
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Simon EckermannJudith DwyerEileen WillisJanet KellyBen EwaldWJ GillespieMichael J. SorichMichael D. Wiese
- Topics
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers)Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (7 papers)Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Brita Pekarsky
31 papers receiving 363 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Economics and Econometrics 138
- General Health Professions 105
- Surgery 57
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 55
- Oncology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Brita Pekarsky
This map shows the geographic impact of Brita Pekarsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brita Pekarsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brita Pekarsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brita Pekarsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brita Pekarsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brita Pekarsky. The network helps show where Brita Pekarsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brita Pekarsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brita Pekarsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brita Pekarsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brita Pekarsky. Brita Pekarsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | Managing Two Worlds Together: Stage 3: Improving Aboriginal Patient Journeys - Workbook (Version 1) | 3 |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | Managing Two Worlds Together: Study 3—The Experiences of Patients and Their Carers | 5 |
| 11 | Managing two worlds together : Study 4 - Complex country Aboriginal patient journeys | 1 |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | Evalulation of clinical interventions within community pharmacy (PROMISs II) | 2 |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Brita Pekarsky
Brita Pekarsky is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (7 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (45 citations), Economics and Econometrics (138 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (31 citations). Brita Pekarsky has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Simon Eckermann, Judith Dwyer, Eileen Willis, Janet Kelly, Ben Ewald, WJ Gillespie, Michael J. Sorich, Michael D. Wiese, David Henry and Tamara Mackean. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Addiction and The Journal of Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.