Brigite Botequim
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 10%
- Co-authors
- José G. BorgesSusete MarquesJordi García-GonzaloJuan Guerra-HernándezEduardo González‐FerreiroManuela OliveiraMargarida ToméSérgio Godinho
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (15 papers)Fire effects on ecosystems (12 papers)Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Brigite Botequim
24 papers receiving 563 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Global and Planetary Change 404
- Environmental Engineering 247
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 234
- Ecology 199
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 61
Countries citing papers authored by Brigite Botequim
This map shows the geographic impact of Brigite Botequim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brigite Botequim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brigite Botequim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brigite Botequim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brigite Botequim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brigite Botequim. The network helps show where Brigite Botequim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brigite Botequim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brigite Botequim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brigite Botequim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brigite Botequim. Brigite Botequim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 91 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Brigite Botequim
Brigite Botequim is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (15 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (12 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (234 citations), Global and Planetary Change (404 citations) and Environmental Engineering (247 citations). Brigite Botequim has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include José G. Borges, Susete Marques, Jordi García-Gonzalo, Juan Guerra-Hernández, Eduardo González‐Ferreiro, Manuela Oliveira, Margarida Tomé, Sérgio Godinho, Adrián Pascual and Paulo M. Fernandes. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Remote Sensing and International Journal of Wildland Fire.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.