Brian Tew

49 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Brian Tew
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 208
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 87
  • Clinical Psychology 219
  • Finance 89
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 99
Replace Cynthia A. Joyner with:
Cynthia A. Joyner United States
Ken Fogelman United Kingdom
Jessica Johnson United States
John S. Robey United States
Roberto Andorno Switzerland
Karen Léonard United States
Allyson Lucinda Benton Mexico
James Gilbert United States
John Pratt New Zealand
William J. House United States
Brian Tew relative to Cynthia A. Joyner United States Cynthia A. Joyner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×43.5×
Cynthia A. Joyner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Tew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Tew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Tew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Tew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Tew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Tew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Tew. The network helps show where Brian Tew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Brian Tew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Tew Line = papers co-authored together Brian Tew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973126
2 195776
3 197571
4 197960
5 197553
6 195325
7 195523
8 197423
9 196822
10 195419
11 195316
12
Current concepts in spina bifida and hydrocephalus
199115
13 197715
14 195714
15 196013
16 198513
17 195313
18 195713
19 197412
20 199012

About Brian Tew

Brian Tew is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 57 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (14 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (5 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (4 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers) and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (208 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (87 citations), Clinical Psychology (219 citations), Finance (89 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (99 citations). Brian Tew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include K. M. Laurence, Richard Ν. Gardner, R. S. Sayers, R. M. Hartwell, Prasanna Samuel, Carys M. Bannister, Philip W. Bell, W. Braddock Hickman, Victoria A. Jenkins and Jean Meynaud. Their work appears in journals such as Economica, The Economic Journal, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, The Economic History Review and Child Care Health and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact