Brian L. Hanson

933 total citations
19 papers, 577 citations indexed

About

Brian L. Hanson is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Brian L. Hanson has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 577 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 9 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Brian L. Hanson's work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (12 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers) and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (5 papers). Brian L. Hanson is often cited by papers focused on Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (12 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers) and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (5 papers). Brian L. Hanson collaborates with scholars based in United States. Brian L. Hanson's co-authors include Douglas A. Howell, Eric Elton, T. Qaseem, Willis G. Parsons, Robert M. Dy, David J. Desilets, Anthony R. Mattia, John J. Bosco, Michael A. Jones and Wendy H. Gerstein and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Journal of Urban Design.

In The Last Decade

Brian L. Hanson

16 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brian L. Hanson United States 9 511 430 376 63 15 19 577
Margreet van Putten Netherlands 13 311 0.6× 343 0.8× 140 0.4× 69 1.1× 6 0.4× 25 496
Joyce Flueckiger United States 6 305 0.6× 262 0.6× 210 0.6× 9 0.1× 4 0.3× 10 347
R. Soetikno United States 10 227 0.4× 284 0.7× 250 0.7× 102 1.6× 4 0.3× 20 428
Umberto Morelli Italy 10 295 0.6× 81 0.2× 130 0.3× 28 0.4× 4 0.3× 20 348
Wobbe O. de Steur Netherlands 14 247 0.5× 408 0.9× 127 0.3× 161 2.6× 3 0.2× 26 509
T. Qaseem United States 9 422 0.8× 370 0.9× 213 0.6× 55 0.9× 1 0.1× 27 466
Johanne Rigaux Belgium 7 514 1.0× 483 1.1× 305 0.8× 95 1.5× 11 596
Laura Lazzell–Pannell United States 10 644 1.3× 596 1.4× 489 1.3× 33 0.5× 15 704
Jesús Espinel Spain 10 404 0.8× 351 0.8× 171 0.5× 37 0.6× 34 457
Bonnie J. Pollack United States 6 281 0.5× 256 0.6× 217 0.6× 67 1.1× 10 382

Countries citing papers authored by Brian L. Hanson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian L. Hanson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian L. Hanson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian L. Hanson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian L. Hanson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian L. Hanson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian L. Hanson. The network helps show where Brian L. Hanson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian L. Hanson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian L. Hanson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian L. Hanson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian L. Hanson. Brian L. Hanson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Hanson, Brian L.. (2019). The Eucharistic Debate in Tudor England: Thomas Cranmer, Stephen Gardiner, and the English Reformation. Renaissance and Reformation. 42(2). 195–197.
2.
Hanson, Brian L.. (2019). Reformation of the Commonwealth. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooks.
3.
Lawrence, Christopher, et al.. (2004). ERCP Sphincterotomy Without Initial Manometry for Type II Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction Patients: A Safe and Effective Strategy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 59(5). P99–P99.
4.
Desilets, David J., Robert M. Dy, Brian L. Hanson, et al.. (2001). Endoscopic management of tumors of the major duodenal papilla: Refined techniques to improve outcome and avoid complications. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 54(2). 202–208. 137 indexed citations
5.
Hanson, Brian L., et al.. (2001). Reuniting Urban Form and Urban Process: The Prince of Wales's Urban Design Task Force. Journal of Urban Design. 6(2). 185–209. 3 indexed citations
6.
Desilets, David J., et al.. (2000). 3799 Pancreatic sepsis as a late complication of endoscopic pancreatic duct stone removal.. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 51(4). AB138–AB138. 1 indexed citations
7.
Howell, Simon, et al.. (2000). Infected pancreatic pseudocysts with colonic fistula formation successfully managed by endoscopic drainage alone: report of two cases. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 95(7). 1821–1823. 1 indexed citations
8.
Howell, Douglas A., et al.. (2000). Infected Pancreatic Pseudocysts With Colonic Fistula Formation Successfully Managed by Endoscopic Drainage Alone: Report of Two Cases. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 95(7). 1821–1823. 22 indexed citations
9.
Howell, Douglas A., et al.. (1999). Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones using a 10F pancreatoscope and electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 50(6). 829–833. 62 indexed citations
10.
Elton, Eric, Brian L. Hanson, T. Qaseem, & Douglas A. Howell. (1998). Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP using an enteroscope and a pediatric colonoscope in long-limb surgical bypass patients. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 47(1). 62–67. 104 indexed citations
11.
Elton, Eric, et al.. (1998). Dilated common channel syndrome: endoscopic diagnosis, treatment, and relationship to choledochocele formation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 47(6). 471–478. 17 indexed citations
12.
Elton, Eric, Douglas A. Howell, Willis G. Parsons, T. Qaseem, & Brian L. Hanson. (1998). Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy: indications, outcome, and a safe stentless technique. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 47(3). 240–249. 99 indexed citations
13.
Howell, Douglas A., Willis G. Parsons, Michael A. Jones, John J. Bosco, & Brian L. Hanson. (1996). Complete tissue sampling of biliary strictures at ERCP using a new device. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 43(5). 498–502. 79 indexed citations
14.
Howell, Douglas A., T. Qaseem, Brian L. Hanson, et al.. (1996). Needle knife papillotomy (NKP) without stent insertion for the difficult sphincterotomy (ES): A standardized technique explained. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 43(4). 383–383. 2 indexed citations
15.
Parsons, Willis G., et al.. (1995). Pancreatic duct sphincterotomy without stenting. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 41(4). 427–427. 7 indexed citations
16.
Howell, Douglas A., Brian L. Hanson, Willis G. Parsons, John J. Bosco, & T. Qaseem. (1995). Reducing overall endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) complications: The impact of needle knife papillotomy (NKP). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 41(4). 400–400. 2 indexed citations
17.
Parsons, Willis G., Brian L. Hanson, & Debra Howell. (1995). Duodenal involvement by pancreatic adenocarcinoma at initial ERCP: Outcome of endoscopic therapy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 41(4). 426–426. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hanson, Brian L., et al.. (1993). Utility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of idiopathic abdominal pain.. PubMed. 88(9). 1355–8. 20 indexed citations
19.
Hanson, Brian L., et al.. (1985). Moore's introduction to English canon law. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026