Brian E. Daley
Impact in
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Medieval Literature and History
- Religious studies top 2%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 12
- Theology and Canon Law Studies 5
- Classics 10
- Byzantine Studies and History 9
- Co-authors
- Luther H. MartinAndrew McGowanBen QuashRowan WilliamsFergus KerrAidan NicholsNicholas M. HealyMark A. McIntosh
- Journals
- Theological Studies (3 papers)Journal of early Christian studies (2 papers)Augustinian Studies (2 papers)Numen (1 paper)Traditio (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brian E. Daley
22 papers receiving 119 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Classics 59
- Religious studies 66
- Philosophy 53
- Anthropology 41
- Archeology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Brian E. Daley
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian E. Daley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian E. Daley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian E. Daley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian E. Daley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian E. Daley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian E. Daley. The network helps show where Brian E. Daley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Brian E. Daley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cristo, el Dios visible: la fe de Calcedonia y la cristología patrística | 2020 | 1 |
| 2 | God visible: patristic Christology reconsidered | 2018 | 3 |
| 3 | The Harp of Prophecy: Early Christian Interpretation of the Psalms | 2014 | 1 |
| 4 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 5 | God in early Christian thought : essays in memory of Lloyd G. Patterson | 2009 | 7 |
| 6 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 8 | Making a human will divine: Augustine and Maximus on Christ and human salvation | 2008 | 1 |
| 9 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 3 |
About Brian E. Daley
Brian E. Daley is a scholar working on Religious studies, Classics, History, Archeology and Anthropology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (12 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (9 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (6 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (5 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (59 citations), Religious studies (66 citations), Philosophy (53 citations), Anthropology (41 citations) and Archeology (43 citations). Brian E. Daley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Luther H. Martin, Andrew McGowan, Ben Quash, Rowan Williams, Fergus Kerr, Aidan Nichols, Nicholas M. Healy, Mark A. McIntosh, Geoffrey Wainwright and William T. Dickens. Their work appears in journals such as Theological Studies, Journal of early Christian studies, Augustinian Studies, Numen and Traditio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.