Brenda L. Key

610 total citations
16 papers, 426 citations indexed

About

Brenda L. Key is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Brenda L. Key has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 426 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Brenda L. Key's work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (4 papers). Brenda L. Key is often cited by papers focused on Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (4 papers). Brenda L. Key collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Brenda L. Key's co-authors include Tavis S. Campbell, Simon Bacon, Randi E. McCabe, William Gerin, Sheryl M. Green, Peter Bieling, Karen Rowa, Elizabeth J. Pawluk, Sheila G. West and Kristin A. Zernicke and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Psychosomatic Medicine and Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Brenda L. Key

16 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Brenda L. Key Canada	10	171	159	85	68	58	16	426
Nienke M. Bosch Netherlands	5	159 0.9×	78 0.5×	67 0.8×	16 0.2×	38 0.7×	6	355
Luljeta Emini Switzerland	10	103 0.6×	96 0.6×	108 1.3×	80 1.2×	24 0.4×	10	495
Ghislaine Badawi Canada	9	154 0.9×	50 0.3×	83 1.0×	217 3.2×	44 0.8×	12	548
Danielle A. Young United States	10	134 0.8×	49 0.3×	64 0.8×	11 0.2×	49 0.8×	30	287
Carlos Góis Portugal	13	165 1.0×	37 0.2×	43 0.5×	120 1.8×	45 0.8×	28	495
Benedict Herhaus Germany	8	102 0.6×	33 0.2×	60 0.7×	15 0.2×	42 0.7×	27	282
Sheila G. West United States	9	46 0.3×	39 0.2×	167 2.0×	78 1.1×	38 0.7×	11	374
L Levi Sweden	12	110 0.6×	60 0.4×	37 0.4×	51 0.8×	28 0.5×	28	503
Nicholas Olendzki United States	6	472 2.8×	231 1.5×	15 0.2×	68 1.0×	30 0.5×	6	619
Marjan D van den Berg Netherlands	6	58 0.3×	39 0.2×	65 0.8×	26 0.4×	20 0.3×	6	325

Countries citing papers authored by Brenda L. Key

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brenda L. Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brenda L. Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brenda L. Key more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brenda L. Key

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brenda L. Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brenda L. Key. The network helps show where Brenda L. Key may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brenda L. Key

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brenda L. Key. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brenda L. Key based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brenda L. Key. Brenda L. Key is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

Bawor, Monica, Brittany B. Dennis, Meha Bhatt, et al.. (2020). Feasibility of behavioral activation group therapy in reducing depressive symptoms and improving quality of life in patients with depression: the BRAVE pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 6(1). 61–61. 6 indexed citations

Green, Sheryl M., Benício N. Frey, Donna M. Fedorkow, et al.. (2019). Cognitive behavior therapy for menopausal symptoms (CBT-Meno): a randomized controlled trial. Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. 26(9). 972–980. 52 indexed citations

Samaan, Zainab, Brenda L. Key, Sandra Chalmers, et al.. (2018). Patient Experiences and Opinions of a Behavioral Activation Group Intervention for Depression. Research on Social Work Practice. 29(1). 10–18. 3 indexed citations

Key, Brenda L., Karen Rowa, Peter Bieling, Randi E. McCabe, & Elizabeth J. Pawluk. (2017). Mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy as an augmentation treatment for obsessive–compulsive disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 24(5). 1109–1120. 70 indexed citations

Samaan, Zainab, Brittany B. Dennis, Laura Zielinski, et al.. (2016). Behavioral activation group therapy for reducing depressive symptoms and improving quality of life: a feasibility study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2(1). 22–22. 10 indexed citations

Key, Brenda L., et al.. (2016). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Residual Symptoms in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a Qualitative Analysis. Mindfulness. 8(1). 190–203. 10 indexed citations

Samaan, Zainab, Brittany B. Dennis, Sandra Chalmers, et al.. (2015). A pragmatic pilot randomized trial to investigate the effectiveness of behavioural activation group therapy in reducing depressive symptoms and improving quality of life in patients with depression: the BRAVE pilot trial protocol. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 1(1). 39–39. 5 indexed citations

Key, Brenda L. & Peter Bieling. (2015). Beyond DSM diagnosis: The pros and cons of cognitive case formulation.. 1 indexed citations

Moll, Sandra, Andrea Frolic, & Brenda L. Key. (2015). Investing in compassion: exploring mindfulness as a strategy to enhance interpersonal relationships in healthcare practice. Journal of Hospital Administration. 4(6). 36–36. 17 indexed citations

10.

Johnson, Jillian A., Brenda L. Key, Faye S. Routledge, William Gerin, & Tavis S. Campbell. (2014). High Trait Rumination Is Associated with Blunted Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure Dipping. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 48(3). 384–391. 8 indexed citations

11.

Green, Sheryl M., Brenda L. Key, & Randi E. McCabe. (2014). Cognitive-behavioral, behavioral, and mindfulness-based therapies for menopausal depression: A review. Maturitas. 80(1). 37–47. 29 indexed citations

12.

Mills, Jennifer S., et al.. (2012). Wanting a body that's better than average: The effect of manipulated body norms on ideal body size perception. Body Image. 9(3). 365–372. 16 indexed citations

13.

Key, Brenda L., Kharah M. Ross, Simon Bacon, Kim Lavoie, & Tavis S. Campbell. (2009). Depressed Affect is Associated with Poorer Cardiovascular Recovery in Young Women Following a Mental Stressor. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 38(2). 154–159. 7 indexed citations

14.

Key, Brenda L., Tavis S. Campbell, Simon Bacon, & William Gerin. (2008). The influence of trait and state rumination on cardiovascular recovery from a negative emotional stressor. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 31(3). 237–248. 117 indexed citations

15.

Campbell, Tavis S., Brenda L. Key, Alana Ireland, Simon Bacon, & Blaine Ditto. (2008). Early Socioeconomic Status is Associated With Adult Nighttime Blood Pressure Dipping. Psychosomatic Medicine. 70(3). 276–281. 16 indexed citations

16.

Zernicke, Kristin A., et al.. (2007). A High-Fat Meal Increases Cardiovascular Reactivity to Psychological Stress in Healthy Young Adults. Journal of Nutrition. 137(4). 935–939. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact