Brecht De Smet
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Pollution
- Plant Science
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Co-authors
- Walter SteurbautE. De WulfSami ZemniKoenraad BogaertBénédicte VagenendeCemal Burak Tansel
- Topics
- Political theory and Gramsci (9 papers)Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism (2 papers)Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCrop ProtectionAntipode
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brecht De Smet
17 papers receiving 195 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Sociology and Political Science 118
- Political Science and International Relations 70
- Pollution 29
- Plant Science 23
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 16
Countries citing papers authored by Brecht De Smet
This map shows the geographic impact of Brecht De Smet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brecht De Smet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brecht De Smet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brecht De Smet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brecht De Smet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brecht De Smet. The network helps show where Brecht De Smet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brecht De Smet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brecht De Smet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brecht De Smet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brecht De Smet. Brecht De Smet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Gramsci on Tahrir: Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Egypt | 18 |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | Theory and its consequences: a reply to Joel Beinin | 3 |
| 8 | Once again on Caesarism: continuing the debate with Joel Beinin | 2 |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | Trade unions and dictatorship in Egypt | 2 |
| 11 | A Dialectical Pedagogy of Revolt: Gramsci, Vygotsky, and the Egyptian Revolution | 14 |
| 12 | Dreaming about the lesser evil: revolutionary desire and the limits of democratic transition in Egypt | 0 |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 6 |
About Brecht De Smet
Brecht De Smet is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 18 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political theory and Gramsci (9 papers), Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism (2 papers) and Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (70 citations), Sociology and Political Science (118 citations) and Pollution (29 citations). Brecht De Smet has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Walter Steurbaut, E. De Wulf, Sami Zemni, Koenraad Bogaert, Bénédicte Vagenende and Cemal Burak Tansel. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Crop Protection and Antipode.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.