Countries citing papers authored by John S. Applegate
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John S. Applegate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John S. Applegate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John S. Applegate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John S. Applegate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John S. Applegate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John S. Applegate. The network helps show where John S. Applegate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John S. Applegate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John S. Applegate.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John S. Applegate based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John S. Applegate. John S. Applegate is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Applegate, John S., et al.. (2008). Missing Information: The Scientific Data Gap in Conservation and Chemical Regulation. Indiana law journal.1 indexed citations
2.
Applegate, John S.. (2008). Bridging the Data Gap: Balancing the Supply and Demand for Chemical Information. Texas law review. 86(7). 1365.5 indexed citations
Applegate, John S., et al.. (2006). Environmental law : RCRA, CERCLA, and the management of hazardous waste.1 indexed citations
5.
Wagner, Wendy, Donald Kennedy, Thomas O. McGarity, et al.. (2006). Rescuing Science from Politics. Cambridge University Press eBooks.12 indexed citations
6.
Applegate, John S.. (2002). The Taming of the Precautionary Principle. William and Mary environmental law and policy review. 27(1). 13.16 indexed citations
7.
Applegate, John S.. (2001). The Prometheus Principle: Using the Precautionary Principle to Harmonize the Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 9(1). 11.7 indexed citations
Applegate, John S., et al.. (1999). Learning from NEPA: Some Guidelines for Responsible Federal Risk Legislation.1 indexed citations
12.
Applegate, John S.. (1999). Book Review. National Security and Environmental Protection: The Half-Full Glass.1 indexed citations
13.
Applegate, John S.. (1998). Beyond the Usual Suspects: The Use of Citizens Advisory Boards in Environmental Decisionmaking. Indiana law journal. 73(3). 4.21 indexed citations
14.
Applegate, John S., et al.. (1998). Short Changing Short-Term Risk: A Study of Superfund Remedy Selection. Yale journal on regulation. 15(2). 3.2 indexed citations
15.
Applegate, John S.. (1998). Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Priorities Projects: A Forum, Not a Formula.
Applegate, John S.. (1995). A Beginning and Not an End in Itself: The Role of Risk Assessment in Environmental Decision-Making. University of Cincinnati law review.5 indexed citations
18.
Applegate, John S.. (1992). Worst Things First: Risk, Information, and Regulatory Structure in Toxic Substances Control. Yale journal on regulation. 9(2). 2.5 indexed citations
Applegate, John S. & Amy G. Applegate. (1980). Pen Registers After Smith v. Maryland.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.