Brant Wenegrat
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Judith M. FordAdolf PfefferbaumBert S. KopellWalton T. RothRay JohnsonDavid L. SmithF. Denoth
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryAnnual Review of PsychologyElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Brant Wenegrat
12 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 814
- Psychiatry and Mental health 226
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 183
- Social Psychology 61
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 54
Countries citing papers authored by Brant Wenegrat
This map shows the geographic impact of Brant Wenegrat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brant Wenegrat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brant Wenegrat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brant Wenegrat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brant Wenegrat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brant Wenegrat. The network helps show where Brant Wenegrat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brant Wenegrat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brant Wenegrat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brant Wenegrat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brant Wenegrat. Brant Wenegrat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Theater of Disorder: Patients, Doctors, and the Construction of Illness | 6 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Current methodological issues in ERP research: some remarks and proposals. A review. | 3 |
| 9 | 471 | |
| 10 | 378 | |
| 11 | 128 | |
| 12 | 13 |
About Brant Wenegrat
Brant Wenegrat is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (814 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (226 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (183 citations). Brant Wenegrat has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Judith M. Ford, Adolf Pfefferbaum, Bert S. Kopell, Walton T. Roth, Ray Johnson, David L. Smith and F. Denoth. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Annual Review of Psychology and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.