Brandon C. Rayhaun
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Hannes P. SaalSliman J. Bensmaı̈aBenoit P. DelhayeYichul ChoiShu-Heng ShaoDominic J. WilliamsonSunil MukhiHao Geng
- Topics
- Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (6 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers)Quantum many-body systems (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPhysical Review LettersJournal of High Energy Physics
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brandon C. Rayhaun
10 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Cognitive Neuroscience 143
- Biomedical Engineering 73
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 68
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 62
- Geometry and Topology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Brandon C. Rayhaun
This map shows the geographic impact of Brandon C. Rayhaun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brandon C. Rayhaun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brandon C. Rayhaun more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brandon C. Rayhaun
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brandon C. Rayhaun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brandon C. Rayhaun. The network helps show where Brandon C. Rayhaun may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brandon C. Rayhaun
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brandon C. Rayhaun. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brandon C. Rayhaun based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brandon C. Rayhaun. Brandon C. Rayhaun is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 55 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 169 |
About Brandon C. Rayhaun
Brandon C. Rayhaun is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (6 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (143 citations), Computational Mathematics (4 citations) and Geometry and Topology (54 citations). Brandon C. Rayhaun has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hannes P. Saal, Sliman J. Bensmaı̈a, Benoit P. Delhaye, Yichul Choi, Shu-Heng Shao, Dominic J. Williamson, Sunil Mukhi, Hao Geng, Shamit Kachru and Andreas Karch. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Journal of High Energy Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.