Countries citing papers authored by Boyce M. Morrison
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Boyce M. Morrison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boyce M. Morrison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boyce M. Morrison more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Boyce M. Morrison
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boyce M. Morrison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boyce M. Morrison. The network helps show where Boyce M. Morrison may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Boyce M. Morrison
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Boyce M. Morrison.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Boyce M. Morrison based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Boyce M. Morrison. Boyce M. Morrison is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Petrone, D, et al.. (2016). Comparative Efficacy of a Soft Toothbrush with Tapered-tip Bristles to an ADA Reference Toothbrush on Gingival Abrasion over a 12-Week Period.. PubMed. 27(2). 48–53.2 indexed citations
2.
Petrone, D, et al.. (2016). Comparative Efficacy of a Soft Toothbrush with Tapered-tip Bristles and an ADA Reference Toothbrush on Established Gingivitis and Supragingival Plaque over a 12-Week Period.. PubMed. 27(2). 39–47.7 indexed citations
3.
Elías-Boneta, Augusto R, et al.. (2015). Efficacy of two fluoride-free, alcohol-free mouthwashes containing 0.075% or 0.07% CPC in controlling established dental plaque and gingivitis over a 6-week period on adults in Puerto Rico.. PubMed. 28 Spec No A. 14A–20A.3 indexed citations
4.
Li, Xue, et al.. (2015). Randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of dentifrices containing 1.5% arginine, an insoluble calcium compound and 1450 ppm fluoride over two years.. PubMed. 26(1). 7–12.29 indexed citations
5.
Elías-Boneta, Augusto R, Luis R Mateo, Patricia Chaknis, et al.. (2015). Efficacy of CPC and essential oils mouthwashes compared to a negative control mouthwash in controlling established dental plaque and gingivitis: A 6-week, randomized clinical trial.. PubMed. 28 Spec No A. 21A–6A.8 indexed citations
6.
Mateo, Luis R, et al.. (2015). Randomized controlled trial comparing a powered toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action to a manual flat trim toothbrush.. PubMed. 28(6). 351–6.5 indexed citations
7.
Kraivaphan, Petcharat, et al.. (2015). Comparing three toothpastes in controlling plaque and gingivitis: A 6-month clinical study.. PubMed. 28(2). 68–74.13 indexed citations
8.
Nathoo, Salim, et al.. (2014). Efficacy of two different toothbrush heads on a sonic power toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush on established gingivitis and plaque.. PubMed. 25(4). 65–70.8 indexed citations
9.
Li, Rui, et al.. (2012). Efficacy of a desensitizing toothpaste containing arginine and calcium carbonate on dentin surface pore structure and dentin morphology.. PubMed. 25(4). 210–4.5 indexed citations
Morrison, Boyce M. & Marc Paye. (1995). A comparison of three in vitro screening tests with an in vivo clinical test to evaluate the irritation potential of antibacterial liquid soaps. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists. 46(6). 291–299.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.