Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient
2003589 citationsPer Ahlgren, Bo Jarneving et al.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Bo Jarneving's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bo Jarneving with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bo Jarneving more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bo Jarneving. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bo Jarneving. The network helps show where Bo Jarneving may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bo Jarneving
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bo Jarneving.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bo Jarneving based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bo Jarneving. Bo Jarneving is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jarneving, Bo. (2009). The publication activity of Region Västra Götaland: a bibliometric study of an administrative and political Swedish region during the period 1998-2006.. Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås). 14(2). 2.4 indexed citations
Jarneving, Bo. (2005). The combined application of bibliographic coupling and the complete link cluster method in bibliometric science mapping. Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University).4 indexed citations
10.
Ahlgren, Per, Bo Jarneving, & Ronald Rousseau. (2004). Rejoinder: In defense of formal methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(10). 936–936.9 indexed citations
11.
Ahlgren, Per, Bo Jarneving, & Ronald Rousseau. (2004). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(9). 843–843.36 indexed citations
12.
Ahlgren, Per, Bo Jarneving, & Ronald Rousseau. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 54(6). 550–560.589 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Jarneving, Bo. (2002). The enhancement of information-seeking through visualization of cognitive structures. Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås).1 indexed citations
14.
Limberg, Louise, et al.. (2002). Informationssökning och lärande - en forskningsöversikt. Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås).11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.