Blake C. Stacey

1.1k citations
14 papers · 237 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Blake C. Stacey

14 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Blake C. Stacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 165
  • Artificial Intelligence 158
  • Applied Mathematics 34
  • History and Philosophy of Science 14
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 34
Replace Mirjam Weilenmann with:
Mirjam Weilenmann Austria
Marc-Olivier Renou Switzerland
Michael Nathanson United States
Mátyás Koniorczyk Hungary
Cambyse Rouzé Germany
Henry Yuen United States
Christopher Hadley United Kingdom
Dennis Kretschmann Germany
Jin-Woo Son South Korea
Zhihua Guo China
Blake C. Stacey relative to Mirjam Weilenmann Austria Mirjam Weilenmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mirjam Weilenmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Blake C. Stacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Blake C. Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blake C. Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blake C. Stacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Blake C. Stacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Blake C. Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Blake C. Stacey. The network helps show where Blake C. Stacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Blake C. Stacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Blake C. Stacey Line = papers co-authored together Blake C. Stacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2017107
2 201729
3 201722
4 202017
5 202012
6 201910
7 20219
8 20149
9 20179
10
Analysis and Synthesis of Minimal Informationally Complete Quantum Measurements
20185
11 20165
12
QBist Quantum Mechanics: Quantum Theory as a Hero's Handbook
20161
13
Multiscale Structure in Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics
20151
14 20171

About Blake C. Stacey

Blake C. Stacey is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Economics and Econometrics and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (11 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (6 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (2 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (165 citations), Artificial Intelligence (158 citations), Applied Mathematics (34 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (34 citations). Blake C. Stacey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Christopher A. Fuchs, Benjamin Allen, Huangjun Zhu, Yaneer Bar‐Yam and Andrei Khrennikov. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. A, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, The European Physical Journal D, Physical Review Research and Foundations of Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact