Blake C. Stacey

1.1k total citations
14 papers, 237 citations indexed

About

Blake C. Stacey is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Blake C. Stacey has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 237 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 4 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Blake C. Stacey's work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (11 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (6 papers). Blake C. Stacey is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Mechanics and Applications (11 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (6 papers). Blake C. Stacey collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Sweden. Blake C. Stacey's co-authors include Christopher A. Fuchs, Yaneer Bar‐Yam, Huangjun Zhu, Benjamin Allen and Andrei Khrennikov and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Physical review. A and Entropy.

In The Last Decade

Blake C. Stacey

14 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Blake C. Stacey

AMPO

AI

SNP

AM

MP

Mirjam Weilenmann Austria

Cambyse Rouzé Germany

Mátyás Koniorczyk Hungary

Marc-Olivier Renou Switzerland

Michael Nathanson United States

Gniewomir Sarbicki Poland

Zhihua Guo China

Henry Yuen United States

Jin-Woo Son South Korea

Min-Soo Kim South Korea

Mirjam Weilenmann Austria

Blake C. Stacey

173 ×1.0

AMPO

159 ×1.0

AI

63 ×1.9

SNP

8 ×0.2

AM

4 ×0.2

MP

Citations per year, relative to Blake C. Stacey Blake C. Stacey (= 1×) peers Mirjam Weilenmann

Countries citing papers authored by Blake C. Stacey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Blake C. Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blake C. Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blake C. Stacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Blake C. Stacey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Blake C. Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Blake C. Stacey. The network helps show where Blake C. Stacey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Blake C. Stacey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Blake C. Stacey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Blake C. Stacey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Blake C. Stacey. Blake C. Stacey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Fuchs, Christopher A., et al.. (2021). Born's rule as a quantum extension of Bayesian coherence. Physical review. A. 104(2). 9 indexed citations

2.

Fuchs, Christopher A., et al.. (2020). Symmetric informationally complete measurements identify the irreducible difference between classical and quantum systems. Physical Review Research. 2(1). 17 indexed citations

3.

Stacey, Blake C., et al.. (2020). Discrete Wigner functions from informationally complete quantum measurements. Physical review. A. 102(3). 12 indexed citations

4.

Stacey, Blake C., et al.. (2019). Lüders channels and the existence of symmetric-informationally-complete measurements. Physical review. A. 100(6). 10 indexed citations

5.

Fuchs, Christopher A., et al.. (2018). Analysis and Synthesis of Minimal Informationally Complete Quantum Measurements. arXiv (Cornell University). 5 indexed citations

6.

Khrennikov, Andrei & Blake C. Stacey. (2017). Aims and Scope of the Special Issue, “Quantum Foundations: Informational Perspective”. Foundations of Physics. 47(8). 1003–1008. 1 indexed citations

7.

Fuchs, Christopher A., et al.. (2017). The SIC Question: History and State of Play. Axioms. 6(3). 21–21. 107 indexed citations

8.

Allen, Benjamin, Blake C. Stacey, & Yaneer Bar‐Yam. (2017). Multiscale Information Theory and the Marginal Utility of Information. Entropy. 19(6). 273–273. 22 indexed citations

9.

Stacey, Blake C.. (2017). Sporadic SICs and the Normed Division Algebras. Foundations of Physics. 47(8). 1060–1064. 9 indexed citations

10.

Fuchs, Christopher A., et al.. (2017). Introducing the Qplex: a novel arena for quantum theory. The European Physical Journal D. 71(7). 29 indexed citations

11.

Fuchs, Christopher A. & Blake C. Stacey. (2016). QBist Quantum Mechanics: Quantum Theory as a Hero's Handbook. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations

12.

Stacey, Blake C.. (2016). Von Neumann was not a Quantum Bayesian. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 374(2068). 20150235–20150235. 5 indexed citations

13.

Stacey, Blake C.. (2015). Multiscale Structure in Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations

14.

Stacey, Blake C.. (2014). SIC-POVMs and Compatibility among Quantum States. arXiv (Cornell University). 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact