Birgit Mathes

1.0k total citations
32 papers, 793 citations indexed

About

Birgit Mathes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Birgit Mathes has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 793 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Birgit Mathes's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (19 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers). Birgit Mathes is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (19 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers). Birgit Mathes collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Türkiye and Australia. Birgit Mathes's co-authors include Canan Başar‐Eroğlu, Christina Schmiedt‐Fehr, Andreas Brand, Manfred Fahle, Helmut Hildebrandt, Karina Karolina Kedzior, Daniel Strüber, Michael A. Stadler, Jörg Zimmermann and Ayşegül Özerdem and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, Psychological Medicine and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

Birgit Mathes

31 papers receiving 782 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Birgit Mathes Germany 16 665 208 79 62 59 32 793
Shi‐Jiang Li United States 14 584 0.9× 193 0.9× 75 0.9× 54 0.9× 41 0.7× 17 837
Ian M. Devonshire United Kingdom 16 346 0.5× 202 1.0× 43 0.5× 43 0.7× 57 1.0× 32 639
Giri P. Krishnan United States 18 761 1.1× 403 1.9× 117 1.5× 53 0.9× 91 1.5× 27 1.0k
Wolfgang M. Pauli United States 12 555 0.8× 144 0.7× 59 0.7× 154 2.5× 58 1.0× 17 817
István Kondákor Hungary 19 642 1.0× 312 1.5× 151 1.9× 42 0.7× 52 0.9× 30 789
Courtney L. Gallen United States 16 489 0.7× 145 0.7× 100 1.3× 157 2.5× 51 0.9× 26 802
Tomer Fekete United States 16 484 0.7× 123 0.6× 52 0.7× 71 1.1× 43 0.7× 29 721
Xue-Lian Qi United States 19 916 1.4× 234 1.1× 57 0.7× 70 1.1× 59 1.0× 33 996
Stuart D. Washington United States 11 348 0.5× 121 0.6× 111 1.4× 28 0.5× 51 0.9× 21 540
Dillan J. Newbold United States 6 869 1.3× 100 0.5× 62 0.8× 150 2.4× 70 1.2× 10 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Mathes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Mathes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Mathes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Mathes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Mathes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Mathes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Mathes. The network helps show where Birgit Mathes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Birgit Mathes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Birgit Mathes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Birgit Mathes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Birgit Mathes. Birgit Mathes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mathes, Birgit, et al.. (2024). Innovation. Frühe Bildung. 13(2). 116–118. 1 indexed citations
3.
Mathes, Birgit, et al.. (2020). Altered gamma and theta oscillations during multistable perception in schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 155. 127–139. 12 indexed citations
4.
Başar‐Eroğlu, Canan, et al.. (2018). Novelty N2-P3a Complex and Theta Oscillations Reflect Improving Neural Coordination Within Frontal Brain Networks During Adolescence. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 12. 218–218. 8 indexed citations
5.
Schmiedt‐Fehr, Christina, et al.. (2016). Aging differentially affects alpha and beta sensorimotor rhythms in a go/nogo task. Clinical Neurophysiology. 127(10). 3234–3242. 43 indexed citations
6.
Mathes, Birgit, et al.. (2016). Maturation of the P3 and concurrent oscillatory processes during adolescence. Clinical Neurophysiology. 127(7). 2599–2609. 11 indexed citations
7.
Başar‐Eroğlu, Canan, et al.. (2015). Altered alpha brain oscillations during multistable perception in schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 103. 118–128. 11 indexed citations
8.
Başar, Ertuğrul, Christina Schmiedt‐Fehr, Birgit Mathes, et al.. (2015). What does the broken brain say to the neuroscientist? Oscillations and connectivity in schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, and bipolar disorder. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 103. 135–148. 60 indexed citations
9.
Koch, Michael, Christina Schmiedt‐Fehr, & Birgit Mathes. (2015). Neuropharmacology of altered brain oscillations in schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 103. 62–68. 19 indexed citations
10.
Mathes, Birgit, et al.. (2015). Theta response in schizophrenia is indifferent to perceptual illusion. Clinical Neurophysiology. 127(1). 419–430. 13 indexed citations
11.
Mathes, Birgit, et al.. (2014). Frontal theta activity is pronounced during illusory perception. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 94(3). 445–454. 13 indexed citations
12.
Başar‐Eroğlu, Canan, Christina Schmiedt‐Fehr, & Birgit Mathes. (2013). Auditory-evoked alpha oscillations imply reduced anterior and increased posterior amplitudes in schizophrenia. Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology. 62. 121–129. 15 indexed citations
13.
Başar‐Eroğlu, Canan, Birgit Mathes, Andreas Brand, & Christina Schmiedt‐Fehr. (2010). Occipital gamma response to auditory stimulation in patients with schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 79(1). 3–8. 16 indexed citations
14.
Schmiedt‐Fehr, Christina, et al.. (2008). Altered oscillatory alpha and theta networks in schizophrenia. Brain Research. 1235. 143–152. 55 indexed citations
15.
Başar‐Eroğlu, Canan, Christina Schmiedt‐Fehr, Birgit Mathes, Jörg Zimmermann, & Andreas Brand. (2008). Are oscillatory brain responses generally reduced in schizophrenia during long sustained attentional processing?. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 71(1). 75–83. 44 indexed citations
16.
Mathes, Birgit & Manfred Fahle. (2007). Closure facilitates contour integration. Vision Research. 47(6). 818–827. 49 indexed citations
17.
Mathes, Birgit & Manfred Fahle. (2007). The electrophysiological correlate of contour integration is similar for color and luminance mechanisms. Psychophysiology. 44(2). 305–322. 23 indexed citations
18.
Picchioni, Marco, Páll Matthíasson, Matthew R. Broome, et al.. (2007). Medial temporal lobe activity at recognition increases with the duration of mnemonic delay during an object working memory task. Human Brain Mapping. 28(11). 1235–1250. 25 indexed citations
19.
Mathes, Birgit, Daniel Strüber, Michael A. Stadler, & Canan Başar‐Eroğlu. (2006). Voluntary control of Necker cube reversals modulates the EEG delta- and gamma-band response. Neuroscience Letters. 402(1-2). 145–149. 55 indexed citations
20.
Mathes, Birgit, et al.. (2006). The electrophysiological correlate of contour integration is modulated by task demands. Brain Research. 1114(1). 98–112. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026