Bing-Wei Li

496 citations
32 papers · 399 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Bing-Wei Li

32 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Bing-Wei Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 161
  • Computer Networks and Communications 288
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 91
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 32
  • Condensed Matter Physics 29
Replace Jan Frederik Totz with:
Jan Frederik Totz Germany
Seon Hee Park South Korea
M. Rivera Mexico
Tae-Wook Ko South Korea
A. M. Yacomotti France
Igor Mitkov United States
Christina Schenk Spain
Toni Pérez Spain
Rajesh Ramaswamy Switzerland
Konrad Giżyński Poland
Bing-Wei Li relative to Jan Frederik Totz Germany Jan Frederik Totz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Jan Frederik Totz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bing-Wei Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing-Wei Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing-Wei Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing-Wei Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing-Wei Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing-Wei Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing-Wei Li. The network helps show where Bing-Wei Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bing-Wei Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bing-Wei Li Line = papers co-authored together Bing-Wei Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201655
2 200742
3 201435
4 201529
5 201223
6 201321
7 200817
8 200917
9 202116
10 201913
11 200713
12 200712
13 201211
14 201610
15 200610
16 20109
17 20138
18 20067
19 20156
20 20176

About Bing-Wei Li

Bing-Wei Li is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (28 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (6 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (6 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (6 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (161 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (288 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (91 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (32 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (29 citations). Bing-Wei Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Belgium and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Hong Zhang, Hans Dierckx, Xi‐Qiao Feng, He-Ping Ying, Xiang Gao, Re Xia, Jianlin Liu, Guang Hu, Xingang Wang and Xia Feng. Their work appears in journals such as Chinese Physics Letters, Physical review. E, New Journal of Physics, Physics Letters A and Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact