Bing Luo

28 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Bing Luo
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 27
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 60
  • Organic Chemistry 80
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 39
  • Reproductive Medicine 14
Replace Omar F. Abdul‐Rasheed with:
Omar F. Abdul‐Rasheed Iraq
Mingan Li China
Yanqin Guo China
Siyuan Wang China
Minkyung Lee South Korea
Xinjuan Zhang China
Jingyi Wen China
Yu Cai China
Bing Luo relative to Omar F. Abdul‐Rasheed Iraq Omar F. Abdul‐Rasheed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Omar F. Abdul‐Rasheed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bing Luo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing Luo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing Luo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing Luo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing Luo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing Luo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing Luo. The network helps show where Bing Luo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bing Luo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bing Luo Line = papers co-authored together Bing Luo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201596
2 201646
3 200724
4 201824
5 201623
6 201421
7 201319
8 201515
9 201614
10 201314
11 202111
12 20158
13 20217
14 20196
15 20235
16 20225
17 20134
18
[Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma].
20084
19 20214
20 20193

About Bing Luo

Bing Luo is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 36 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (6 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (3 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers), Full-Duplex Wireless Communications (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers), Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (2 papers) and Catalytic Alkyne Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (27 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (60 citations), Organic Chemistry (80 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (39 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (14 citations). Bing Luo has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ying Cui, Li‐Biao Han, Lixiong Zhang, Ruwei Shen, Shenghong Ju, Hua‐Jun Chen, Gao‐Jun Teng, Yun Jiao, Jie Ding and Li Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Drug Design Development and Therapy, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Energy and Buildings and Molecular Imaging and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact