Bill Sacks

817 total citations
13 papers, 484 citations indexed

About

Bill Sacks is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Bill Sacks has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 484 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 4 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Bill Sacks's work include Effects of Radiation Exposure (8 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (8 papers) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (4 papers). Bill Sacks is often cited by papers focused on Effects of Radiation Exposure (8 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (8 papers) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (4 papers). Bill Sacks collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Thailand. Bill Sacks's co-authors include Jeffry A. Siegel, James S. Welsh, Douglas Van Nostrand, Andrew Taylor, Bennett S. Greenspan, Alan H. Maurer, Edward B. Silberstein, William T. Phillips and N.H. Casey and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Today, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Meat Science.

In The Last Decade

Bill Sacks

13 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bill Sacks United States 10 221 78 58 57 57 13 484
Shuang Zang China 12 74 0.3× 59 0.8× 26 0.4× 99 1.7× 33 0.6× 55 371
Osman Çelbiş Türkiye 12 93 0.4× 78 1.0× 10 0.2× 41 0.7× 100 1.8× 59 569
Gregg VandeKieft United States 6 30 0.1× 45 0.6× 14 0.2× 25 0.4× 52 0.9× 26 546
Susanne Lindqvist United Kingdom 17 89 0.4× 33 0.4× 13 0.2× 88 1.5× 36 0.6× 38 801
Heather L. Bartlett United States 17 16 0.1× 98 1.3× 33 0.6× 72 1.3× 171 3.0× 42 736
Aoife Gallagher Ireland 11 180 0.8× 114 1.5× 4 0.1× 61 1.1× 18 0.3× 40 423
Zakia Médiouni France 9 75 0.3× 61 0.8× 79 1.4× 6 0.1× 87 1.5× 28 353
Andrew Wood United Kingdom 10 26 0.1× 135 1.7× 31 0.5× 79 1.4× 36 0.6× 36 471
Daphne James Australia 8 47 0.2× 37 0.5× 44 0.8× 4 0.1× 14 0.2× 23 255
Philip K. Wilson United States 12 49 0.2× 17 0.2× 18 0.3× 48 0.8× 107 1.9× 50 674

Countries citing papers authored by Bill Sacks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Sacks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Sacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Sacks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Sacks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Sacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Sacks. The network helps show where Bill Sacks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bill Sacks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bill Sacks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bill Sacks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bill Sacks. Bill Sacks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
2.
Siegel, Jeffry A., Bennett S. Greenspan, Alan H. Maurer, et al.. (2018). The BEIR VII Estimates of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks Are Based on Faulty Assumptions and Data Analyses: A Call for Reassessment. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 59(7). 1017–1019. 43 indexed citations
3.
Siegel, Jeffry A., et al.. (2017). Dose Optimization to Minimize Radiation Risk for Children Undergoing CT and Nuclear Medicine Imaging Is Misguided and Detrimental. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 58(6). 865–868. 45 indexed citations
4.
Sacks, Bill & Jeffry A. Siegel. (2017). Preserving the Anti-Scientific Linear No-Threshold Myth: Authority, Agnosticism, Transparency, and the Standard of Care. Dose-Response. 15(3). 3794090503–3794090503. 17 indexed citations
5.
Sacks, Bill, et al.. (2017). Time to Eliminate LNT: The NRC Needs to Adopt LT and Eliminate ALARA. 2(1). 2 indexed citations
6.
Siegel, Jeffry A., et al.. (2016). Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 58(1). 1–6. 91 indexed citations
8.
Siegel, Jeffry A., et al.. (2015). Low-dose radiation exposure should not be feared. Physics Today. 69(1). 12–13. 1 indexed citations
9.
Siegel, Jeffry A., et al.. (2015). The Birth of the Illegitimate Linear No-Threshold Model. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 41(2). 173–177. 20 indexed citations
10.
11.
Sacks, Bill. (1984). Lead versus health: sources and effects of low level lead exposure. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 60(700). 176–176. 14 indexed citations
12.
Sacks, Bill. (1983). Aliens and Alienists. Ethnic Minorities and Psychiatry. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 59(691). 340–340. 152 indexed citations
13.
Sacks, Bill, et al.. (1969). A Case of “Double Autoscopy”. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 115(520). 343–345. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026