411 total citations 12 papers, 10 citations indexed
About
B.H. Stolte is a scholar working on Classics, Anthropology and History.
According to data from OpenAlex, B.H. Stolte has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 10 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Classics, 8 papers in Anthropology and 5 papers in History. Recurrent topics in B.H. Stolte's work include Byzantine Studies and History (8 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers) and Classical Studies and Legal History (3 papers). B.H. Stolte is often cited by papers focused on Byzantine Studies and History (8 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers) and Classical Studies and Legal History (3 papers). B.H. Stolte collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. B.H. Stolte's co-authors include N. van der Wal and has published in prestigious journals such as The Classical Review, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies and University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology).
In The Last Decade
B.H. Stolte
6 papers
receiving
7 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B.H. Stolte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.H. Stolte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.H. Stolte more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.H. Stolte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.H. Stolte. The network helps show where B.H. Stolte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B.H. Stolte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B.H. Stolte.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B.H. Stolte based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B.H. Stolte. B.H. Stolte is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Stolte, B.H.. (2011). The Value of the Byzantine Tradition for Textual Criticism of the Corpus Iuris Civilis: 'Graeca leguntur'. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 667–680.
Stolte, B.H.. (2005). Trebatius in Palimpsest. Notes on Cicero Ad Familiares VII, 18. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2005(1). 316–320.
4.
Stolte, B.H.. (2004). Is Byzantine Law roman Law. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 111–126.1 indexed citations
5.
Stolte, B.H.. (2002). Magic and Byzantine law in the seventh century. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 1. 105–115.1 indexed citations
6.
Stolte, B.H.. (1998). Aberra Jembere: Legal history of Ethiopia 1434-1974. Some aspects of substantive and procedural laws (diss. EU Rotterdam), Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit, Leiden: Afrika Studiecentrum 1998. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 159. 378–379.1 indexed citations
Stolte, B.H. & N. van der Wal. (1994). Collectio Tripartita: Justinian on Religious and Ecclesiastical Affairs. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
Stolte, B.H.. (1984). The Partes of the Digest in the Codex Florentinus. 1. 69–92.1 indexed citations
12.
Stolte, B.H.. (1981). Henrik Brenkman, Jurist and Classicist: A Chapter from the History of Roman Law as Part of the Classical Tradition. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.