B.F. Stanton

7.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
31 papers, 4.7k citations indexed

About

B.F. Stanton is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, B.F. Stanton has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 4.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in B.F. Stanton's work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (12 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (6 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (3 papers). B.F. Stanton is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural Economics and Policy (12 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (6 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (3 papers). B.F. Stanton collaborates with scholars based in United States. B.F. Stanton's co-authors include Everett M. Rogers, Linda Kaljee, Jennifer Galbraith, Xiaoming Li, Susan Feigelman, Robin Nesbitt, Lesley Cottrell, Maureen M. Black, Lauri Kettunen and Randolph Barker and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Food Policy and Journal of Heredity.

In The Last Decade

B.F. Stanton

27 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Diffusion of Innovations

1963 4.3k citations B.F. Stanton, Everett M. Rogers Journal of Farm Economics profile →

Peers

B.F. Stanton

SPS

SM

GHP

EE

MSOR

Marjatta Hietala Finland

George Hayward United Kingdom

Horst W. J. Rittel United States

Rex Stockton United States

Alan Neustadtl United States

Frederick Herzberg United States

Réjean Landry Canada

Linda S. Lotto United States

R. Dale Wilson United States

Ella Louise Bell United States

Marjatta Hietala Finland

B.F. Stanton

1.1k ×1.0

SPS

715 ×1.1

SM

518 ×0.8

GHP

423 ×0.7

EE

511 ×0.9

MSOR

Citations per year, relative to B.F. Stanton B.F. Stanton (= 1×) peers Marjatta Hietala

Countries citing papers authored by B.F. Stanton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B.F. Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.F. Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.F. Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B.F. Stanton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.F. Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.F. Stanton. The network helps show where B.F. Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B.F. Stanton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B.F. Stanton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B.F. Stanton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B.F. Stanton. B.F. Stanton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Stanton, B.F.. (2007). George F. Warren: Farm Economist. eCommons (Cornell University). 7(2). 214–8. 4 indexed citations

2.

Stanton, B.F.. (2002). Longitudinal Influence of Perceptions of Peer and Parental Factors on African American Adolescent Risk Involvement. Journal of Heredity. 79(4). 536–548. 126 indexed citations

3.

Galbraith, Jennifer, et al.. (1996). Challenges and Rewards of Involving Community in Research: An Overview of the "Focus on Kids" HIV Risk Reduction Program. Health Education Quarterly. 23(3). 383–394. 54 indexed citations

4.

Stanton, B.F., Susan Feigelman, Jennifer Galbraith, et al.. (1995). Development of a Culturally, Theoretically and Developmentally Based Survey Instrument for Assessing Risk Behaviors Among African-American Early Adolescents Living in Urban Low-Income Neighborhoods. AIDS Education and Prevention. 7(2). 160–177. 108 indexed citations

5.

Olson, Kent D., B.F. Stanton, & Arne Hallam. (1993). Projections of structural change and the future of American agriculture.. 587–627. 1 indexed citations

6.

Stanton, B.F., et al.. (1991). Trends and development of agricultural economics and rural sociology in the United States.. 1–11. 1 indexed citations

7.

Stanton, B.F., et al.. (1991). Farm Structure: Concept and Definition. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 14–41. 3 indexed citations

8.

Stanton, B.F., et al.. (1989). CHANGES IN FARM SIZE AND STRUCTURE IN AMERICAN AGRICULTURE IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 42–70. 4 indexed citations

9.

Kaiser, Harry M., et al.. (1986). Mandatory supply management -- a dairy policy option. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota). 2 indexed citations

10.

Stanton, B.F.. (1983). Farm Family Income by Size of Farm and Region United States, 1979. eCommons (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations

11.

Lowenberg‐DeBoer, James & B.F. Stanton. (1983). Getting Started in Farming 1910, 1930, 1950 and 1978: Is It More Difficult?. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 12(1). 1–6. 1 indexed citations

12.

Stanton, B.F.. (1982). Farm Numbers and Their Implications for Economic Analysis. 11(2). 7–18. 1 indexed citations

13.

Stavins, Robert N. & B.F. Stanton. (1980). Using Markov Models to Predict the Size Distribution of Dairy Farms, New York State, 1968-1985. eCommons (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations

14.

Stanton, B.F.. (1980). ESCS Staff. Structure Issues of American Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, USDA Agr. Econ. Rep. 438, Nov. 1979, 305 pp. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 62(2). 363–364. 14 indexed citations

15.

Stanton, B.F.. (1979). Some Political Arithmetic of Large and Small. 8(2). 1–15. 1 indexed citations

16.

Stanton, B.F.. (1972). Clientele for Continuing Education in the 1970's. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 54(5). 910–915. 1 indexed citations

17.

Stanton, B.F., et al.. (1970). A Balance sheet of agriculture for Finland 1948-1967. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)). 3 indexed citations

18.

Stanton, B.F. & Lauri Kettunen. (1967). Potential Entrants and Projections in Markov Process Analysis. Journal of Farm Economics. 49(3). 633–633. 15 indexed citations

19.

Stanton, B.F. & Everett M. Rogers. (1963). Diffusion of Innovations. Journal of Farm Economics. 45(4). 898–898. 4310 indexed citations breakdown →

20.

Stanton, B.F., et al.. (1961). Seasonal Demand for Beef, Pork, and Broilers. Agricultural economics research. 13(1). 1–14. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact