Bethany E. Schaffer
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism 2
- Co-authors
- Anne Brunet (3 shared papers)D. Grahame Hardie (1 shared paper)Julien Sage (6 shared papers)Chenwei Lin (3 shared papers)Anthony N. Karnezis (2 shared papers)Deborah L. Burkhart (1 shared paper)Gloria Yiu (1 shared paper)Jamie F. Conklin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Cell Biology (2 papers)Cell Metabolism (1 paper)The EMBO Journal (1 paper)Cell Cycle (1 paper)Trends in Cell Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Bethany E. Schaffer
11 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Cancer Research 267
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Aging 27
- Oncology 393
- Physiology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Bethany E. Schaffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Bethany E. Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bethany E. Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bethany E. Schaffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bethany E. Schaffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bethany E. Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bethany E. Schaffer. The network helps show where Bethany E. Schaffer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bethany E. Schaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMPK: An Energy-Sensing Pathway with Multiple Inputs and Outputs Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 699 |
| 2 | 2011 | 169 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 161 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 145 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 143 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 95 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 8 |
About Bethany E. Schaffer
Bethany E. Schaffer is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Physiology, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (2 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (2 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (267 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Aging (27 citations), Oncology (393 citations) and Physiology (60 citations). Bethany E. Schaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Anne Brunet, D. Grahame Hardie, Julien Sage, Chenwei Lin, Anthony N. Karnezis, Deborah L. Burkhart, Gloria Yiu, Jamie F. Conklin, E. Alejandro Sweet‐Cordero and Hannes Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Cell Metabolism, The EMBO Journal, Cell Cycle and Trends in Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.