Bertrand Schatz

4.1k total citations
116 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Bertrand Schatz is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Bertrand Schatz has authored 116 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 99 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 58 papers in Plant Science and 45 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Bertrand Schatz's work include Plant and animal studies (96 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (48 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (37 papers). Bertrand Schatz is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (96 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (48 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (37 papers). Bertrand Schatz collaborates with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Czechia. Bertrand Schatz's co-authors include Martine Hossaert‐McKey, Guy Beugnon, Magali Proffit, Jean-Paul Lachaud, Doyle McKey, Jean‐Marie Bessière, Gabriel Debout, Marianne Élias, Laurent Dormont and Mathilde Dufaÿ and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Bertrand Schatz

113 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Bertrand Schatz

EEBS

GENET

NLC

Rubén Alarcón United States

Giorgina Bernasconi Switzerland

Renee M. Borges India

Nicolas J. Vereecken Belgium

Atsushi Kawakita Japan

Martine Hossaert‐McKey France

Frances S. Chew United States

Allan G. Ellis South Africa

Hannes F. Paulus Austria

Isabel Alves‐dos‐Santos Brazil

Rubén Alarcón United States

Bertrand Schatz

1.8k ×0.8

EEBS

1.2k ×1.0

521 ×0.5

GENET

776 ×1.2

NLC

452 ×0.7

Citations per year, relative to Bertrand Schatz Bertrand Schatz (= 1×) peers Rubén Alarcón

Countries citing papers authored by Bertrand Schatz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bertrand Schatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bertrand Schatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bertrand Schatz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bertrand Schatz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bertrand Schatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bertrand Schatz. The network helps show where Bertrand Schatz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bertrand Schatz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bertrand Schatz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bertrand Schatz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bertrand Schatz. Bertrand Schatz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gros, Raphaël, et al.. (2025). Effects of Panels and Management on Plant Community Composition in Southern French Solar Parks. Applied Vegetation Science. 28(3).

Genoud, David, et al.. (2025). BeeFunc, a comprehensive trait database for French bees. Scientific Data. 12(1). 1302–1302. 1 indexed citations

Michelot‐Antalik, Alice, Francesco de Bello, Jérémy Grosjean, et al.. (2025). Handbook of protocols for standardized measurements of floral traits for pollinators in temperate communities. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 16(5). 988–1001. 4 indexed citations

Lewin, Menachem, et al.. (2025). How much nectar can wild bees carry? Allometric equations of nectar crop capacities for investigating bee nutrition and foraging ecology. Journal of Insect Physiology. 164. 104840–104840.

Isselin‐Nondedeu, Francis, et al.. (2025). Effects of solar panels and management on pollinators and their interactions with plants in Southern French solar parks. Biological Conservation. 307. 111209–111209. 1 indexed citations

Gibert, Anaïs, Michel Baguette, Christelle Fraïssé, et al.. (2024). Holocene Climate Change Promoted Allopatric Divergence and Disjunct Geographic Distribution in a Bee Orchid Species. Journal of Biogeography. 51(12). 2424–2439. 2 indexed citations

Těšitelová, Tamara, et al.. (2023). Orchid–mycorrhizal fungi interactions reveal a duality in their network structure in two European regions differing in climate. Molecular Ecology. 32(12). 3308–3321. 7 indexed citations

Abeli, Thomas, Matthew A. Albrecht, Bruno Colas, et al.. (2023). Achieving conservation outcomes in plant mitigation translocations: the need for global standards. Plant Ecology. 224(9). 745–763. 9 indexed citations

Viruel, Juan, Bertrand Schatz, Roberta Gargiulo, et al.. (2021). Microsatellites and petal morphology reveal new patterns of admixture in Orchis hybrid zones. American Journal of Botany. 108(8). 1388–1404. 15 indexed citations

10.

Buatois, Bruno, Nina Hautekèete, François Massol, et al.. (2021). Geographical variation of floral scents in generalist entomophilous species with variable pollinator communities. Functional Ecology. 36(3). 763–778. 10 indexed citations

11.

Schatz, Bertrand, Mickaël Henry, Benoît Geslin, et al.. (2021). Pollinator conservation in the context of global changes with a focus on France and Belgium. Acta Oecologica. 112. 103765–103765. 15 indexed citations

12.

Baguette, Michel, et al.. (2020). Why are there so many bee‐orchid species? Adaptive radiation by intra‐specific competition for mnesic pollinators. Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 95(6). 1630–1663. 35 indexed citations

13.

Hautekèete, Nina, et al.. (2020). How biased is our perception of plant-pollinator networks? A comparison of visit- and pollen-based representations of the same networks. Acta Oecologica. 105. 103551–103551. 23 indexed citations

14.

Hautekèete, Nina, et al.. (2020). Does phenology explain plant–pollinator interactions at different latitudes? An assessment of its explanatory power in plant–hoverfly networks in French calcareous grasslands. Oikos. 129(5). 753–765. 19 indexed citations

15.

Massol, François, et al.. (2018). Effect of pollination strategy, phylogeny and distribution on pollination niches of Euro‐Mediterranean orchids. Journal of Ecology. 107(1). 478–490. 47 indexed citations

16.

Hossaert‐McKey, Martine, et al.. (2010). Geographic variation of floral scent in a highly specialized pollination mutualism. Phytochemistry. 72(1). 74–81. 55 indexed citations

17.

Zachariades, C., Bertrand Schatz, & Stephen G. Compton. (2010). Wasp emergence from the figs of Ficus sur: characteristics and predation by ants. Tropical Zoology. 23(2). 121–138. 9 indexed citations

18.

Lambrechts, Marcel M., Bertrand Schatz, & Patrice Bourgault. (2008). Interactions between ants and breeding Paridae in two distinct Corsican oak habitats. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 17 indexed citations

19.

Proffit, Magali, et al.. (2008). Signalling receptivity: Comparison of the emission of volatile compounds by figs of Ficus hispida before, during and after the phase of receptivity to pollinators. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 59 indexed citations

20.

Schatz, Bertrand, et al.. (1995). Spatial fidelity and individual foraging specializations in the neotropical ponerine ant, ectatomma ruidum roger (hymenoptera, formicidae). Sociobiology. 26(3). 269–282. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact