Bert de Wit
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Papers in
-
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics 1
-
- Climate Change Communication and Perception 1
- Co-authors
- Ilan Chabay (1 shared paper)Ilona M. Otto (1 shared paper)Peter Moll (1 shared paper)J. David Tàbara (1 shared paper)Frans Berkhout (1 shared paper)Christian Pohl (1 shared paper)Jill Jäger (1 shared paper)Arthur C. Petersen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Environmental Science & Policy (1 paper)VU Research Portal (1 paper)UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwedenNetherlandsSpain
In The Last Decade
Bert de Wit
2 papers receiving 373 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Global and Planetary Change 223
- Management of Technology and Innovation 46
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 77
- Ecological Modeling 20
- Management Science and Operations Research 52
Countries citing papers authored by Bert de Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of Bert de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert de Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bert de Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert de Wit. The network helps show where Bert de Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Bert de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 392 |
| 2 | Transdisciplinarity in Practice. Innovation and knowledge-integration in Sustainable Urban Development. The Osdorp Complex 50 case. | 2003 | 2 |
| 3 | Natuurbeleid als strijdpunt: veranderende politiek-maatschappelijke context en de Natuurkenning | 2011 | 1 |
About Bert de Wit
Bert de Wit is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research and Education, having authored 3 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (1 paper), Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Environmental Conservation and Management (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (223 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (46 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (77 citations), Ecological Modeling (20 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (52 citations). Bert de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ilan Chabay, Ilona M. Otto, Peter Moll, J. David Tàbara, Frans Berkhout, Christian Pohl, Jill Jäger, Arthur C. Petersen, Sarah Cornell and David Mills. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Policy, VU Research Portal and UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.