Bert Aldenkamp

424 total citations
9 papers, 308 citations indexed

About

Bert Aldenkamp is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Bert Aldenkamp has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 308 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Bert Aldenkamp's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers). Bert Aldenkamp is often cited by papers focused on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers). Bert Aldenkamp collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Spain. Bert Aldenkamp's co-authors include Paul Boon, Evert Thiery, Robrecht Raedt, Dirk Van Roost, Kristl Vonck, Marijke Miatton, J. Hendriksen, Johan Arends, Rolf Lamerichs and Stephan Heunis and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Epilepsia and Human Brain Mapping.

In The Last Decade

Bert Aldenkamp

9 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Bert Aldenkamp Netherlands	6	173	113	111	66	65	9	308
Libor Ustohal Czechia	11	172 1.0×	172 1.5×	202 1.8×	57 0.9×	24 0.4×	40	446
Carlotta Di Domenico Italy	10	144 0.8×	110 1.0×	51 0.5×	18 0.3×	68 1.0×	18	322
Sarah Wheeler Canada	7	212 1.2×	37 0.3×	153 1.4×	17 0.3×	27 0.4×	13	411
Jennifer Cromer United States	6	173 1.0×	86 0.8×	111 1.0×	10 0.2×	64 1.0×	6	387
Claudia Cacciari Italy	11	144 0.8×	126 1.1×	84 0.8×	25 0.4×	17 0.3×	13	395
Tammy D. Kim South Korea	9	118 0.7×	66 0.6×	52 0.5×	16 0.2×	29 0.4×	11	318
Olivia Hampton United States	6	136 0.8×	159 1.4×	49 0.4×	16 0.2×	38 0.6×	11	344
Lídia Vaqué‐Alcázar Spain	11	240 1.4×	90 0.8×	141 1.3×	17 0.3×	30 0.5×	31	445
David Zilles‐Wegner Germany	12	134 0.8×	229 2.0×	44 0.4×	23 0.3×	38 0.6×	37	394
Jianhua Sheng China	13	203 1.2×	205 1.8×	76 0.7×	17 0.3×	22 0.3×	33	438

Countries citing papers authored by Bert Aldenkamp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert Aldenkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert Aldenkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert Aldenkamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert Aldenkamp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert Aldenkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert Aldenkamp. The network helps show where Bert Aldenkamp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bert Aldenkamp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bert Aldenkamp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bert Aldenkamp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bert Aldenkamp. Bert Aldenkamp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Heunis, Stephan, Rolf Lamerichs, Svitlana Zinger, et al.. (2020). Quality and denoising in real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback: A methods review. Human Brain Mapping. 41(12). 3439–3467. 30 indexed citations

2.

Klooster, Debby, Karen Caeyenberghs, Alexander Leemans, et al.. (2019). Structural connectivity between dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cingulate cortex predicts clinical response to accelerated iTBS in major depression. Brain stimulation. 12(2). 449–450. 1 indexed citations

3.

Besseling, René M.H., Rolf Lamerichs, Stephan Heunis, et al.. (2018). Functional network abnormalities consistent with behavioral profile in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging. 275. 43–48. 9 indexed citations

4.

Heunis, Stephan, Rolf Lamerichs, Svitlana Zinger, et al.. (2018). Quality and denoising in real-time fMRI neurofeedback: a methods review. TU/e Research Portal. 3 indexed citations

5.

Heunis, Stephan, René M.H. Besseling, Rolf Lamerichs, et al.. (2018). Neu3CA-RT: A framework for real-time fMRI analysis. Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging. 282. 90–102. 6 indexed citations

6.

Wijnen, Ben, Ghislaine van Mastrigt, Silvia Evers, et al.. (2017). A systematic review of economic evaluations of treatments for patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 58(5). 706–726. 33 indexed citations

7.

Vonck, Kristl, Robrecht Raedt, Evert Thiery, et al.. (2014). Vagus nerve stimulation…25 years later! What do we know about the effects on cognition?. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 45. 63–71. 144 indexed citations

8.

Arends, Johan, et al.. (2012). Cognitive effects of interictal epileptiform discharges in children. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 16(6). 697–706. 81 indexed citations

9.

Meinardi, H., et al.. (1991). Mental deterioration in a population with intractable epilepsy.. PubMed. 3. 7–13. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact