Bernice Coleman

46 papers receiving 671 citations

Peers

Bernice Coleman
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 15
  • Transplantation 24
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Genetics 162
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 95
Replace Sundas Khan with:
Sundas Khan United States
Joanna Fishbein United States
Farhat Farrokhi Iran
Jan Dudley United Kingdom
Marjorie Foo Singapore
Laurence E. Shields United States
Maureen Thompson United States
Jayne Smith‐Palmer Switzerland
Antje Koller Switzerland
Karim Soliman United States
Bernice Coleman relative to Sundas Khan United States Sundas Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Sundas Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bernice Coleman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bernice Coleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernice Coleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernice Coleman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bernice Coleman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernice Coleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernice Coleman. The network helps show where Bernice Coleman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bernice Coleman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bernice Coleman Line = papers co-authored together Bernice Coleman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201972
2 201668
3 200861
4 200758
5 201438
6 201537
7 201730
8 200230
9 200829
10 201628
11 201824
12 202022
13
Knowledge, beliefs and practices of African-American nurses regarding genetics/genomics.
200921
14 201619
15 202117
16 201611
17 202211
18 202010
19 20179
20 20198

About Bernice Coleman

Bernice Coleman is a scholar working on Genetics, General Health Professions, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 50 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (8 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (6 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 citations), Transplantation (24 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Genetics (162 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (95 citations). Bernice Coleman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Janet K. Williams, Monica Colvin, Alanna A. Morris, E. Kransdorf, L. Czer, Robert M. Kass, Alfredo Trento, Sorel Goland, Angela Starkweather and James Mirocha. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Outlook, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Nursing Administration Quarterly and Clinical Nurse Specialist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact