Bernhard Lachenmayr

778 total citations
56 papers, 554 citations indexed

About

Bernhard Lachenmayr is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Bernhard Lachenmayr has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 554 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Ophthalmology, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Bernhard Lachenmayr's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (8 papers). Bernhard Lachenmayr is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (8 papers). Bernhard Lachenmayr collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Canada and China. Bernhard Lachenmayr's co-authors include Hans Brettel, E. Eugenie Hartmann, Markus Schaumberger, Stephen M. Drance, Stephen M. Drance, P. Juhani Airaksinen, Gordon R. Douglas, Kees Wijsman, E. H. Glass and Frederick S. Mikelberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Diabetes, Vision Research and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Bernhard Lachenmayr

52 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bernhard Lachenmayr Germany 13 308 188 167 112 90 56 554
David R. Neima Canada 10 225 0.7× 160 0.9× 143 0.9× 165 1.5× 83 0.9× 14 449
Aparna Raghuram United States 14 204 0.7× 167 0.9× 200 1.2× 243 2.2× 73 0.8× 47 587
E Aulhorn Germany 11 223 0.7× 165 0.9× 97 0.6× 95 0.8× 61 0.7× 51 415
Evanne J. Casson Canada 11 149 0.5× 202 1.1× 93 0.6× 107 1.0× 40 0.4× 21 416
Thomas Kuyk United States 15 203 0.7× 287 1.5× 114 0.7× 309 2.8× 46 0.5× 39 619
Peter W.T. de Waard Netherlands 11 623 2.0× 97 0.5× 359 2.1× 165 1.5× 71 0.8× 18 743
David B. Elliot Canada 4 218 0.7× 151 0.8× 170 1.0× 282 2.5× 19 0.2× 5 502
Lyne Racette United States 19 963 3.1× 127 0.7× 705 4.2× 112 1.0× 131 1.5× 53 1.2k
Sheryl S. Wizov United States 19 722 2.3× 99 0.5× 440 2.6× 261 2.3× 107 1.2× 40 993
Arkady Selenow United States 12 176 0.6× 286 1.5× 101 0.6× 396 3.5× 38 0.4× 24 556

Countries citing papers authored by Bernhard Lachenmayr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bernhard Lachenmayr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernhard Lachenmayr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernhard Lachenmayr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bernhard Lachenmayr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernhard Lachenmayr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernhard Lachenmayr. The network helps show where Bernhard Lachenmayr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bernhard Lachenmayr

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bernhard Lachenmayr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bernhard Lachenmayr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bernhard Lachenmayr. Bernhard Lachenmayr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bohn, Barbara, Barbara Buchberger, Laura Krabbe, et al.. (2024). Diabetes and Road Traffic. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes. 132(9). 481–496. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bohn, Barbara, Bernd Bertram, Barbara Buchberger, et al.. (2018). S2e-Leitlinie Diabetes und Straßenverkehr. Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel. 13(1). 54–97. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard. (2011). Fallstricke bei der Bestimmung von Fernbrillen. Der Ophthalmologe. 108(4). 318–323. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard. (2006). Visual field and road traffic. How does peripheral vision function. Der Ophthalmologe. 103(5). 373–381. 3 indexed citations
5.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard. (2004). Zur Lage der Begutachtung nach der �nderungsverordnung zur FeV. Der Ophthalmologe. 102(1). 27–32. 1 indexed citations
6.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard, et al.. (1998). Sehstörungen als Unfallursache. 4 indexed citations
7.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard, et al.. (1996). [Effect of low alcohol concentrations on visual attention in street traffic].. PubMed. 93(4). 371–6. 11 indexed citations
8.
Glass, E. H., Markus Schaumberger, & Bernhard Lachenmayr. (1995). Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.. PubMed. 36(9). 1847–54. 23 indexed citations
9.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard & O.-E. Lund. (1994). 15 Jahre automatisierte Perimetrie - Wohin führt der Weg?. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 205(12). 325–328. 2 indexed citations
10.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard, et al.. (1994). [Dependence of the sensitivity of the central visual field on hemoglobin-oxygen saturation].. PubMed. 91(2). 151–5. 12 indexed citations
11.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard. (1994). The role of temporal threshold criteria in psychophysical testing in glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 5(2). 58–63. 3 indexed citations
12.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard & Stephen M. Drance. (1992). Central function and visual field damage in glaucoma. International Ophthalmology. 16(4-5). 203–209. 18 indexed citations
13.
Spiegel, Daniel P., et al.. (1991). Comparative evaluation of the glaucomatous optic disc by laser scanning tomography lts stereophotography and direct ophthalmoscopy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 32(4). 719. 1 indexed citations
14.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard, et al.. (1991). Diffuse and localized glaucomatous field loss in light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 229(3). 267–273. 29 indexed citations
15.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard, P. Juhani Airaksinen, Stephen M. Drance, & Kees Wijsman. (1991). Correlation of retinal nerve-fiber-layer loss, changes at the optic nerve head and various psychophysical criteria in glaucoma. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 229(2). 133–138. 30 indexed citations
16.
Ludwig, K, et al.. (1991). [Changes in the visual field in diabetic retinopathy after grid laser coagulation of the posterior pole of the eye].. PubMed. 88(6). 824–8. 3 indexed citations
17.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard. (1990). [Predicting visual acuity in media opacities and uncorrectable refractive errors. Assessing so-called "retinal visual acuity"].. PubMed. 87 Suppl. S118–37. 1 indexed citations
18.
Landgraf, Rüdiger, J. Nusser, Wolfgang Müller, et al.. (1989). Fate of Late Complications in Type I Diabetic Patients After Successful Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation. Diabetes. 38(Supplement_1). 33–37. 35 indexed citations
19.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard. (1988). Perimetrie gestern und heute. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 193(7). 80–92.
20.
Lachenmayr, Bernhard. (1987). PERIPHERES SEHEN UND REAKTIONSZEIT IM STRASSENVERKEHR. BEEINFLUSSUNG DURCH DIE BEANSPRUCHUNG DES AUTOFAHRERS. 33(4). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026