Bernard Giesen
About
In The Last Decade
Bernard Giesen
2 papers receiving 349 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Sociology and Political Science 277
- Social Psychology 145
- Political Science and International Relations 75
- Clinical Psychology 73
- Cultural Studies 53
Countries citing papers authored by Bernard Giesen
This map shows the geographic impact of Bernard Giesen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernard Giesen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernard Giesen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bernard Giesen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernard Giesen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernard Giesen. The network helps show where Bernard Giesen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bernard Giesen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bernard Giesen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bernard Giesen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bernard Giesen. Bernard Giesen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 491 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.