Berkley Shands
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- William D. ShannonElena DeychErica SodergrenGeorge M. WeinstockYanjiao ZhouNurmohammad ShaikhLaura LinnemanJulie Hoffmann
- Topics
- Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (3 papers)Advanced Data Storage Technologies (3 papers)Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Berkley Shands
9 papers receiving 827 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Nutrition and Dietetics 521
- Molecular Biology 395
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 167
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 138
- Surgery 113
Countries citing papers authored by Berkley Shands
This map shows the geographic impact of Berkley Shands's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Berkley Shands with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berkley Shands more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Berkley Shands
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Berkley Shands. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Berkley Shands. The network helps show where Berkley Shands may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Berkley Shands
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Berkley Shands. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Berkley Shands based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Berkley Shands. Berkley Shands is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Gut bacteria dysbiosis and necrotising enterocolitis in very low birthweight infants: a prospective case-control studybreakdown → | 347 |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | Patterned progression of bacterial populations in the premature infant gutbreakdown → | 414 |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 20 |
About Berkley Shands
Berkley Shands is a scholar working on Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (3 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (521 citations), Pharmacy (73 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (138 citations). Berkley Shands has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include William D. Shannon, Elena Deych, Erica Sodergren, George M. Weinstock, Yanjiao Zhou, Nurmohammad Shaikh, Laura Linneman, Julie Hoffmann, Phillip I. Tarr and Barbara Warner. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.