Benoît Trojak

30 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers

Benoît Trojak
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Periodontics 44
  • Neurology 58
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Clinical Psychology 125
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 105
Replace Anna Klimkiewicz with:
Anna Klimkiewicz Poland
Xiao‐Lan Cao China
Albert Michael United Kingdom
Tumbwene Mwansisya Tanzania
Ingo Zobel Germany
Thaís Bento Lima da Silva Brazil
Matthew J. Worley United States
Oğuz Karamustafalıoğlu Türkiye
Giulia Adavastro Italy
Zeina Chemali United States
Benoît Trojak relative to Anna Klimkiewicz Poland Anna Klimkiewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Anna Klimkiewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Trojak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Trojak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Trojak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Trojak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Trojak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Trojak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Trojak. The network helps show where Benoît Trojak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Trojak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Trojak Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Trojak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011163
2 201559
3 201344
4 202026
5 201725
6 201125
7 200923
8 201523
9 202222
10 201721
11 201919
12 202114
13 201112
14 202211
15 202310
16 20219
17 20189
18 20158
19 20188
20 20236

About Benoît Trojak

Benoît Trojak is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Periodontics, Toxicology, Neurology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (4 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Periodontics (44 citations), Neurology (58 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Clinical Psychology (125 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations). Benoît Trojak has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Sophia Achab, Jean‐Christophe Chauvet‐Gélinier, Bernard Bonin, Pierre Vandel, Julie Monnin, Magali Nicolier, Émmanuel Haffen, Frédéric Mauny, Philip Gorwood and D. Sechter. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, L Encéphale, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Addiction and Journal of Behavioral Addictions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact