Benoît Scherrer

2.3k citations
83 papers · 1.9k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît Scherrer

83 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Benoît Scherrer
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 710
  • Physiology 319
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 206
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 134
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 88
Replace Scott Kolbe with:
Scott Kolbe Australia
Kiran K. Seunarine United Kingdom
Longchuan Li United States
Diane Teichberg United States
Giada Zoccatelli Italy
Julio E. Villalón‐Reina United States
Suh Lee United States
Rudolph Pienaar United States
Bistra E. Iordanova United States
Moisés Hernández-Fernández United States
Benoît Scherrer relative to Scott Kolbe Australia Scott Kolbe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17.2×
Scott Kolbe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Scherrer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Scherrer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Scherrer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Scherrer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Scherrer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Scherrer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Scherrer. The network helps show where Benoît Scherrer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Scherrer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Scherrer Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Scherrer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011113
2 2012108
3 201591
4 201984
5 200779
6 201765
7 201264
8 201262
9 200959
10 202058
11 202145
12 201644
13 201939
14 201637
15 201836
16 201935
17 202035
18 201934
19 202034
20 201331

About Benoît Scherrer

Benoît Scherrer is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience and Genetics, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (39 papers), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (11 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (9 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (710 citations), Physiology (319 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (206 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (134 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (88 citations). Benoît Scherrer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Simon Keith Warfield, Mustafa Şahin, Ali Gholipour, Sanjay P. Prabhu, Maxime Taquet, Jurriaan M. Peters, Florence Forbes, Michel Dojat, Catherine Garbay B and Anna K. Prohl. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Neurology, NeuroImage, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Medical Image Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact