Benoît Béranger

675 citations
22 papers · 310 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît Béranger

21 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Benoît Béranger
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 163
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 78
  • Neurology 30
  • Neurology 49
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 47
Replace Samantha Cunningham with:
Samantha Cunningham United States
Shigeyuki Kan Japan
Ulrike Bayer United Kingdom
Stefanie Heba Germany
Carsten Urbanek Germany
Partha Thirumala United States
Chiara Pinardi Italy
Yoshiaki Soma Japan
Lena V. Schumacher Germany
Kwang Su South Korea
Benoît Béranger relative to Samantha Cunningham United States Samantha Cunningham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Samantha Cunningham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Béranger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Béranger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Béranger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Béranger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Béranger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Béranger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Béranger. The network helps show where Benoît Béranger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Béranger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Béranger Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Béranger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018110
2 202258
3 201832
4 202427
5 202313
6 202012
7 20208
8
Multivariate classification provides a neural signature of Tourette disorder: Running head: Multivariate analysis of Tourette disorder
20217
9 20217
10 20246
11 20196
12 20246
13 20255
14 20234
15 20213
16 20241
17 20241
18 20251
19 20211
20 20231

About Benoît Béranger

Benoît Béranger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Neurology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (163 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (78 citations), Neurology (30 citations), Neurology (49 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (47 citations). Benoît Béranger has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Anne-Dominique Devauchelle, Ignacio Rebollo, Catherine Tallon‐Baudry, Emmanuelle Volle, Mathias Benedek, Marcela Ovando‐Tellez, Yoed N. Kenett, Anne Joutel, Clément Huneau and Hugues Chabriat. Their work appears in journals such as Communications Biology, Brain, Cortex, Journal of Psychiatric Research and Movement Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026