Benjamin Wong

458 citations
17 papers · 272 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Wong

16 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers

Benjamin Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
  • Geometry and Topology 62
  • Applied Mathematics 66
  • Political Science and International Relations 26
  • Sociology and Political Science 25
  • Mathematical Physics 4
Replace Miroljub Jevtić with:
Miroljub Jevtić Serbia
Michael Friedrich Otte Germany
Ulrich Albrecht United States
W. H. Cockcroft United Kingdom
Sybilla Beckmann United States
Emilie Wiesner United States
Liang-Cheng Zhang United States
Renato H. L. Pedrosa Brazil
Yunus E. Zeytuncu United States
Aleksey Zinger United States
Benjamin Wong relative to Miroljub Jevtić Serbia Miroljub Jevtić's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.4×
Miroljub Jevtić · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Wong. The network helps show where Benjamin Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Wong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Wong Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Wong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1977159
2 197724
3 201019
4 200013
5
Dissident Democrats: The Challenge of Democratic Leadership in Asia
200813
6 201312
7 20016
8 20195
9 20044
10 20194
11 20234
12 19772
13 20192
14 20212
15 19761
16 20161
17 20201

About Benjamin Wong

Benjamin Wong is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science, Geometry and Topology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 17 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Socioeconomic Development in Asia (4 papers), Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (4 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (2 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers), Model Reduction and Neural Networks (1 paper) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (62 citations), Applied Mathematics (66 citations), Political Science and International Relations (26 citations), Sociology and Political Science (25 citations) and Mathematical Physics (4 citations). Benjamin Wong has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Haig Patapan, John Kane, Boo Cheong Khoo, Kenneth Paul Tan and Murali Damodaran. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Inventiones mathematicae, Information & Communications Technology Law, Millennium Journal of International Studies and Philosophy East and West.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact