Benjamin Speidel

428 total citations
8 papers, 176 citations indexed

About

Benjamin Speidel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Speidel has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 176 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Speidel's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers). Benjamin Speidel is often cited by papers focused on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers). Benjamin Speidel collaborates with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Benjamin Speidel's co-authors include Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Edward F. Chang, Chengjie Xiong, Russ C. Hornbeck, Brian A. Gordon, Shaney Flores, William E. Klunk, Robert A. Koeppe, Andrei G. Vlassenko and Yi Su and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of neurosurgery and Neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Speidel

8 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin Speidel United States 6 104 75 75 35 25 8 176
Lia Talozzi Italy 9 104 1.0× 34 0.5× 94 1.3× 34 1.0× 47 1.9× 22 242
Ana L. Manera Canada 7 59 0.6× 65 0.9× 47 0.6× 51 1.5× 52 2.1× 11 188
Cong Chen China 10 106 1.0× 176 2.3× 40 0.5× 19 0.5× 36 1.4× 41 271
Mateus Henrique Nogueira Brazil 9 84 0.8× 163 2.2× 48 0.6× 31 0.9× 21 0.8× 18 263
Xenia Kobeleva Germany 10 122 1.2× 71 0.9× 33 0.4× 23 0.7× 60 2.4× 20 246
Raviteja Kotikalapudi Germany 8 68 0.7× 38 0.5× 47 0.6× 7 0.2× 17 0.7× 22 156
Julia Sauerbeck Germany 8 61 0.6× 133 1.8× 102 1.4× 123 3.5× 30 1.2× 14 260
Janne M. Papma Netherlands 6 49 0.5× 62 0.8× 57 0.8× 53 1.5× 102 4.1× 7 216
Kwame S. Kutten United States 7 88 0.8× 48 0.6× 157 2.1× 22 0.6× 54 2.2× 15 277
Cihan Catak Germany 9 198 1.9× 145 1.9× 66 0.9× 76 2.2× 59 2.4× 12 335

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Speidel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Speidel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Speidel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Speidel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Speidel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Speidel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Speidel. The network helps show where Benjamin Speidel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Speidel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Speidel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Speidel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Speidel. Benjamin Speidel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Starkweather, Clara Kwon, Leo P. Sugrue, Iahn Cajigas, et al.. (2024). Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation for Inpatient Workup of Treatment-Resistant Depression. Neurosurgery. 95(4). 941–948. 1 indexed citations
2.
Fan, Joline M., A. Moses Lee, Kristin K. Sellers, et al.. (2023). Intracranial electrical stimulation of corticolimbic sites modulates arousal in humans. Brain stimulation. 16(4). 1072–1082. 2 indexed citations
3.
Nichols, Noah, Benjamin Speidel, Joline M. Fan, et al.. (2022). Modern intracranial electroencephalography for epilepsy localization with combined subdural grid and depth electrodes with low and improved hemorrhagic complication rates. Journal of neurosurgery. 138(3). 821–827. 12 indexed citations
4.
Andrews, John P., Benjamin Speidel, Jason E. Chung, et al.. (2022). Dissociation of Broca’s area from Broca’s aphasia in patients undergoing neurosurgical resections. Journal of neurosurgery. 138(3). 847–857. 22 indexed citations
5.
Silva, Alexander B., Ankit N. Khambhati, Benjamin Speidel, Edward F. Chang, & Vikram R. Rao. (2021). Effects of anterior thalamic nuclei stimulation on hippocampal activity: Chronic recording in a patient with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior Reports. 16. 100467–100467. 18 indexed citations
6.
Kleen, Jonathan K., Benjamin Speidel, Maxime O. Baud, et al.. (2021). Accuracy of omni‐planar and surface casting of epileptiform activity for intracranial seizure localization. Epilepsia. 62(4). 947–959. 5 indexed citations
7.
Su, Yi, Shaney Flores, Russ C. Hornbeck, et al.. (2018). Utilizing the Centiloid scale in cross-sectional and longitudinal PiB PET studies. NeuroImage Clinical. 19. 406–416. 71 indexed citations
8.
Leuthardt, Eric C., S. Kathleen Bandt, Carl D. Hacker, et al.. (2018). Integration of resting state functional MRI into clinical practice - A large single institution experience. PLoS ONE. 13(6). e0198349–e0198349. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026