Benjamin Spector

2.6k citations
44 papers · 715 indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Spector

39 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers

Benjamin Spector
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Language and Linguistics 373
  • General Decision Sciences 25
  • Philosophy 123
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 139
  • Artificial Intelligence 252
Replace Jacopo Romoli with:
Jacopo Romoli United Kingdom
Raj Singh Canada
Jaroslav Peregrin Czechia
Caterina Donati Italy
Stephen Wechsler United States
Susanne Winkler Germany
Ivana Bianchi Italy
Sandra Chung United States
Christian Ebert Germany
Alice C. Harris United States
Benjamin Spector relative to Jacopo Romoli United Kingdom Jacopo Romoli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jacopo Romoli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Spector

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Spector's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Spector with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Spector more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Spector

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Spector. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Spector. The network helps show where Benjamin Spector may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Spector, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Spector Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Spector links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011100
2 201359
3 201554
4 201847
5 201345
6 201442
7 201738
8 196132
9 196628
10 198127
11 201723
12 201721
13 202017
14 201016
15 196316
16 201615
17
Not Too Strong! Generalizing the Scope Economy Condition
201014
18 200713
19 201413
20 201612

About Benjamin Spector

Benjamin Spector is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Anatomy, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 44 papers that have together received 715 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (9 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (7 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (7 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (5 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (373 citations), General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Philosophy (123 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (139 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (252 citations). Benjamin Spector has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Burundi. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Chemla, Paul Égré, Danny Fox, Paul Marty, Steven Verheyen, Yasutada Sudo, Márta Abrusán, Manuel Križ, Samuel A. Wells and Gordon K. Klintworth. Their work appears in journals such as Linguistics and Philosophy, JAMA, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Memory and Language and Journal of Semantics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026