Benjamin M. Friedrich

3.4k total citations
62 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Benjamin M. Friedrich is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin M. Friedrich has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 25 papers in Molecular Biology and 24 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Benjamin M. Friedrich's work include Micro and Nano Robotics (31 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (12 papers) and Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (10 papers). Benjamin M. Friedrich is often cited by papers focused on Micro and Nano Robotics (31 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (12 papers) and Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (10 papers). Benjamin M. Friedrich collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Israel and United States. Benjamin M. Friedrich's co-authors include Frank Jülicher, Jonathon Howard, Ingmar H. Riedel‐Kruse, U. Benjamin Kaupp, Luis Álvarez, Jochen C. Rink, Steffen Werner, Veikko F. Geyer, Gerhard Gompper and S. A. Safran and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin M. Friedrich

60 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin M. Friedrich Germany 26 1.2k 841 676 282 245 62 2.2k
Ingmar H. Riedel‐Kruse United States 22 892 0.8× 834 1.0× 708 1.0× 171 0.6× 194 0.8× 64 2.3k
Douglas A. Brown United States 10 738 0.6× 852 1.0× 879 1.3× 111 0.4× 202 0.8× 43 2.2k
Marco Polin United Kingdom 22 1.6k 1.4× 1.2k 1.4× 270 0.4× 375 1.3× 88 0.4× 37 2.3k
Pascal Martin France 29 145 0.1× 741 0.9× 441 0.7× 286 1.0× 230 0.9× 64 3.5k
Jens Elgeti Germany 24 1.8k 1.5× 1.6k 1.9× 437 0.6× 238 0.8× 1.1k 4.6× 43 3.1k
Fernando Peruani France 28 2.5k 2.1× 979 1.2× 798 1.2× 67 0.2× 169 0.7× 60 3.4k
Anna Zafeiris Hungary 5 1.1k 0.9× 445 0.5× 329 0.5× 51 0.2× 103 0.4× 8 2.1k
Tim Sanchez United States 10 1.1k 1.0× 359 0.4× 281 0.4× 92 0.3× 273 1.1× 15 1.7k
Ken Nagai Japan 16 908 0.8× 411 0.5× 227 0.3× 65 0.2× 113 0.5× 48 1.4k
Yaouen Fily United States 13 1.6k 1.4× 576 0.7× 218 0.3× 121 0.4× 151 0.6× 25 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin M. Friedrich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin M. Friedrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin M. Friedrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin M. Friedrich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin M. Friedrich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin M. Friedrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin M. Friedrich. The network helps show where Benjamin M. Friedrich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin M. Friedrich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin M. Friedrich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin M. Friedrich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin M. Friedrich. Benjamin M. Friedrich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chan, Eunice HoYee, et al.. (2025). Muscle growth by sarcomere divisions. Science Advances. 11(28). eadw9445–eadw9445. 1 indexed citations
2.
Diez, Stefan, et al.. (2025). Twist–torsion coupling in beating axonemes. Nature Physics. 21(4). 599–607. 2 indexed citations
3.
Simmchen, Juliane, Daniel Gordon, J.A. Mackenzie, et al.. (2025). Perspective on Interdisciplinary Approaches on Chemotaxis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 64(47). e202504790–e202504790.
4.
5.
Sidor, Clara, et al.. (2024). Mechanisms of Sarcomere Assembly in Muscle Cells Inferred from Sequential Ordering of Myofibril Components. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 2(1). 2 indexed citations
6.
Friedrich, Benjamin M., et al.. (2024). Active fluctuations of axoneme oscillations scale with number of dynein motors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(46). e2406244121–e2406244121. 3 indexed citations
7.
Ringers, Christa, Stephan Bialonski, Jan N. Hansen, et al.. (2023). Novel analytical tools reveal that local synchronization of cilia coincides with tissue-scale metachronal waves in zebrafish multiciliated epithelia. eLife. 12. 19 indexed citations
8.
Feistel, Kerstin, Benjamin M. Friedrich, Anne Grapin‐Botton, et al.. (2023). Emerging principles of primary cilia dynamics in controlling tissue organization and function. The EMBO Journal. 42(21). e113891–e113891. 25 indexed citations
9.
Novak, Maja, et al.. (2022). Gradient sensing in Bayesian chemotaxis. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 138(1). 12001–12001. 5 indexed citations
10.
Friedrich, Benjamin M., et al.. (2021). Fluctuation-response theorem for Kullback-Leibler divergences to quantify causation. arXiv (Cornell University). 5 indexed citations
11.
Gong, An, Gerhard Gompper, U. Benjamin Kaupp, et al.. (2021). Reconstruction of the three-dimensional beat pattern underlying swimming behaviors of sperm. The European Physical Journal E. 44(7). 87–87. 26 indexed citations
12.
Friedrich, Benjamin M., et al.. (2021). Micromotor-mediated sperm constrictions for improved swimming performance. The European Physical Journal E. 44(5). 67–67. 5 indexed citations
13.
Friedrich, Benjamin M., et al.. (2021). Sperm chemotaxis in marine species is optimal at physiological flow rates according theory of filament surfing. PLoS Computational Biology. 17(4). e1008826–e1008826. 11 indexed citations
14.
Wagner, Christian, et al.. (2016). Load Response of the Flagellar Beat. Physical Review Letters. 117(25). 258101–258101. 43 indexed citations
15.
Jikeli, Jan F., Luis Álvarez, Benjamin M. Friedrich, et al.. (2015). Sperm navigation along helical paths in 3D chemoattractant landscapes. Nature Communications. 6(1). 7985–7985. 153 indexed citations
16.
Liu, Song, Claudia Selck, Benjamin M. Friedrich, et al.. (2013). Reactivating head regrowth in a regeneration-deficient planarian species. Nature. 500(7460). 81–84. 137 indexed citations
17.
Armon, Leah, S. Roy Caplan, Michael Eisenbach, & Benjamin M. Friedrich. (2012). Testing Human Sperm Chemotaxis: How to Detect Biased Motion in Population Assays. PLoS ONE. 7(3). e32909–e32909. 13 indexed citations
18.
Friedrich, Benjamin M., Amnon Buxboim, Dennis E. Discher, & S. A. Safran. (2011). Striated Acto-Myosin Fibers Can Reorganize and Register in Response to Elastic Interactions with the Matrix. Biophysical Journal. 100(11). 2706–2715. 37 indexed citations
19.
Friedrich, Benjamin M. & Frank Jülicher. (2009). Steering Chiral Swimmers along Noisy Helical Paths. Physical Review Letters. 103(6). 68102–68102. 67 indexed citations
20.
Friedrich, Benjamin M.. (2006). A mesoscopic model for helical bacterial flagella. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 53(1). 162–178. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026