Anna Zafeiris

3.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Anna Zafeiris is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computer Networks and Communications and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Zafeiris has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 2 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Anna Zafeiris's work include Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (5 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 papers) and Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems (2 papers). Anna Zafeiris is often cited by papers focused on Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (5 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 papers) and Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems (2 papers). Anna Zafeiris collaborates with scholars based in Hungary, Denmark and Iran. Anna Zafeiris's co-authors include Tamás Vicsek, Imre Derényi and Enys Mones and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Scientific Reports and Physics Reports.

In The Last Decade

Anna Zafeiris

8 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Collective motion

2012 2.0k citations Tamás Vicsek, Anna Zafeiris Physics Reports profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Zafeiris Hungary	5	1.1k	639	512	445	354	8	2.1k
Paweł Romańczuk Germany	25	1.1k 1.0×	399 0.6×	808 1.6×	473 1.1×	268 0.8×	77	2.6k
Raphaël Candelier France	16	546 0.5×	640 1.0×	359 0.7×	312 0.7×	213 0.6×	24	2.6k
Guillaume Grégoire France	16	1.6k 1.5×	772 1.2×	742 1.4×	480 1.1×	459 1.3×	31	2.8k
Cristián Huepe United States	21	703 0.7×	756 1.2×	472 0.9×	242 0.5×	311 0.9×	44	2.2k
Francesco Ginelli France	23	1.8k 1.7×	971 1.5×	1.2k 2.3×	474 1.1×	489 1.4×	47	3.1k
Vivien Lecomte France	21	1.1k 1.1×	590 0.9×	1.7k 3.3×	291 0.7×	155 0.4×	54	3.3k
Éric Bertin France	24	1.3k 1.3×	300 0.5×	814 1.6×	346 0.8×	270 0.8×	89	2.0k
Andrea Procaccini Italy	10	452 0.4×	715 1.1×	358 0.7×	186 0.4×	179 0.5×	12	2.3k
Massimiliano Viale Italy	17	1.1k 1.1×	1.3k 2.1×	1.1k 2.1×	414 0.9×	366 1.0×	29	4.1k
E. Cisbani Italy	10	405 0.4×	633 1.0×	321 0.6×	198 0.4×	169 0.5×	86	2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Zafeiris

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Zafeiris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Zafeiris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Zafeiris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Zafeiris

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Zafeiris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Zafeiris. The network helps show where Anna Zafeiris may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Zafeiris

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Zafeiris. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Zafeiris based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Zafeiris. Anna Zafeiris is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Zafeiris, Anna, et al.. (2020). Optimal collective decision making: consensus, accuracy and the effects of limited access to information. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 16997–16997. 4 indexed citations

2.

Derényi, Imre, et al.. (2019). Optimal structure of groups under exposure to fake news. Applied Network Science. 4(1). 2 indexed citations

3.

Zafeiris, Anna, et al.. (2019). Differences in structure and dynamics of networks retrieved from dark and public web forums. Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 525. 326–336. 11 indexed citations

4.

Zafeiris, Anna, et al.. (2017). Phenomenological theory of collective decision-making. Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 479. 287–298. 4 indexed citations

5.

Zafeiris, Anna & Tamás Vicsek. (2017). Why We Live in Hierarchies?. 19 indexed citations

6.

Zafeiris, Anna & Tamás Vicsek. (2017). Why we live in hierarchies: a quantitative treatise. Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences). 14 indexed citations

7.

Zafeiris, Anna & Tamás Vicsek. (2013). Group performance is maximized by hierarchical competence distribution. Nature Communications. 4(1). 2484–2484. 24 indexed citations

8.

Vicsek, Tamás & Anna Zafeiris. (2012). Collective motion. Physics Reports. 517(3-4). 71–140. 2003 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact