Benjamin Lauderdale

2.9k total citations
52 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Benjamin Lauderdale is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Lauderdale has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 14 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Lauderdale's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (26 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (9 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (8 papers). Benjamin Lauderdale is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (26 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (9 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (8 papers). Benjamin Lauderdale collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Benjamin Lauderdale's co-authors include Tom Clark, Heinrich M. Jaeger, John Komlos, Matthias E. Möbius, Sidney R. Nagel, Kenneth Benoit, Alexander Herzog, Drew Conway, Slava Mikhaylov and Michael Laver and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, American Political Science Review and PLoS Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Lauderdale

49 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Benjamin Lauderdale
Frederick Schauer United States
Stephen D. Fisher United Kingdom
Stefan Müller Germany
David Armstrong United States
James D. Long United States
Andrew D. Martin United States
Peter van der Veer Germany
Éric Bélanger Canada
Marc Howard Ross United States
Steve Smith United States
Frederick Schauer United States
Benjamin Lauderdale
Citations per year, relative to Benjamin Lauderdale Benjamin Lauderdale (= 1×) peers Frederick Schauer

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Lauderdale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Lauderdale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Lauderdale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Lauderdale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Lauderdale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Lauderdale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Lauderdale. The network helps show where Benjamin Lauderdale may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Lauderdale

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Lauderdale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Lauderdale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Lauderdale. Benjamin Lauderdale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Broockman, David & Benjamin Lauderdale. (2025). “Moderates”. American Political Science Review. 1–10. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lauderdale, Benjamin, et al.. (2025). Winning Votes and Changing Minds: Do Populist Arguments Affect Candidate Evaluations and Issue Preferences?. British Journal of Political Science. 55. 1 indexed citations
3.
Barnes, Lucy, et al.. (2024). Public Preferences Over Changes to the Composition of Government Tax Revenue. British Journal of Political Science. 54(4). 1457–1467. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lauderdale, Benjamin, et al.. (2024). The effects of party labels on vote choice with realistic candidate differentiation. Political Science Research and Methods. 13(3). 591–610. 2 indexed citations
5.
Lauderdale, Benjamin, et al.. (2023). A Leader Who Sees the World as I Do: Voters Prefer Candidates Whose Statements Reveal Matching Social‐Psychological Attitudes. Political Psychology. 44(4). 893–916. 3 indexed citations
6.
Lauderdale, Benjamin, et al.. (2021). Can citizens guess how other citizens voted based on demographic characteristics?. Political Science Research and Methods. 11(2). 254–274. 11 indexed citations
7.
Clark, Tom, et al.. (2020). Republican-Majority Appellate Panels Increase Execution Rates for Capital Defendants. The Journal of Politics. 83(3). 1163–1167. 5 indexed citations
8.
Hangartner, Dominik, et al.. (2019). Inferring individual preferences from group decisions: judicial preference variation and aggregation in asylum appeals. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 1 indexed citations
9.
Benoit, Kenneth, Paul Nulty, Haiyan Wang, et al.. (2017). kbenoit/quanteda: CRAN v0.99.12. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 11 indexed citations
10.
Hanretty, Chris, Benjamin Lauderdale, & Nick Vivyan. (2016). Comparing Strategies for Estimating Constituency Opinion from National Survey Samples. Political Science Research and Methods. 6(3). 571–591. 33 indexed citations
11.
Lauderdale, Benjamin. (2015). Partisan Disagreements Arising from Rationalization of Common Information. Political Science Research and Methods. 4(3). 477–492. 15 indexed citations
12.
Lauderdale, Benjamin & Drew A. Linzer. (2015). Under-performing, over-performing, or just performing? The limitations of fundamentals-based presidential election forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting. 31(3). 965–979. 18 indexed citations
13.
Lauderdale, Benjamin. (2013). Does Inattention to Political Debate Explain the Polarization Gap between the U.S. Congress and Public?. Public Opinion Quarterly. 77(S1). 2–23. 13 indexed citations
14.
Arnaiz, Olivier, Nathalie Mathy, Sophie Malinsky, et al.. (2012). The Paramecium Germline Genome Provides a Niche for Intragenic Parasitic DNA: Evolutionary Dynamics of Internal Eliminated Sequences. PLoS Genetics. 8(10). e1002984–e1002984. 126 indexed citations
15.
Lauderdale, Benjamin & Tom Clark. (2012). The Supreme Court's Many Median Justices. American Political Science Review. 106(4). 847–866. 86 indexed citations
16.
Zucco, César & Benjamin Lauderdale. (2011). Distinguishing Between Influences on Brazilian Legislative Behavior. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 36(3). 363–396. 54 indexed citations
17.
Lauderdale, Benjamin. (2010). Does Congress Represent Public Opinion as it is or as it Might Be. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
18.
Komlos, John & Benjamin Lauderdale. (2007). The mysterious trend in American heights in the 20th century. Annals of Human Biology. 34(2). 206–215. 98 indexed citations
19.
Möbius, Matthias E., Benjamin Lauderdale, Sidney R. Nagel, & Heinrich M. Jaeger. (2001). Size separation of granular particles. Nature. 414(6861). 270–270. 248 indexed citations
20.
Lauderdale, Benjamin, et al.. (2000). Compaction of rods: Relaxation and ordering in vibrated, anisotropic granular material. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 61(6). 6914–6921. 99 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Frederick Schauer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen D. Fisher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stefan Müller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Armstrong Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James D. Long Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew D. Martin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter van der Veer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Éric Bélanger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marc Howard Ross Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Steve Smith
Rankless by CCL
2026