Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Media Populism: A Conceptual Clarification and Some Theses on its Effects
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Krämer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Krämer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Krämer. The network helps show where Benjamin Krämer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Krämer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Krämer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Krämer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Krämer. Benjamin Krämer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Metag, Julia, Andreas M. Scheu, Matthias R. Hastall, et al.. (2021). Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis. Studies in Communication and Media. 10(1). I–II.1 indexed citations
Zerback, Thomas, Andreas M. Scheu, Matthias R. Hastall, et al.. (2020). Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis. Studies in Communication and Media. 9(1). I–II.1 indexed citations
7.
Krämer, Benjamin, et al.. (2020). Professionalism as a Response to Right-Wing Populism? An Analysis of a Metajournalistic Discourse. International journal of communication. 14. 23.12 indexed citations
Birkner, Thomas & Benjamin Krämer. (2016). Heads of Government and Their Media Biographies: How the Media Socialization of German Chancellors Influenced their Strategies Toward the Media. International journal of communication. 10. 19.
14.
Zerback, Thomas, Thomas Koch, & Benjamin Krämer. (2015). Thinking of Others. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 92(2). 421–443.41 indexed citations
15.
Krämer, Benjamin. (2013). Strategies of Media Use. Studies in Communication and Media. 2(2). 199–222.5 indexed citations
16.
Krämer, Benjamin. (2011). The Mediatization of Music as the Emergence and Transformation of Institutions: A Synthesis. International journal of communication. 5. 21.4 indexed citations
17.
Engesser, Sven, et al.. (2010). Bereichernd oder belanglos?. Publizistik. 55(2). 129–151.1 indexed citations
18.
Krämer, Benjamin. (2009). Four Voices, One Canon?. European Journal of Communication. 24(3). 325–343.5 indexed citations
19.
Krämer, Benjamin. (2008). The Economy of Media Events: Theory and Examples. International journal of communication. 2. 16.8 indexed citations
20.
Krämer, Benjamin, et al.. (2008). The Effect of Journalistic Co-Orientation on Press Coverage: A Time Series Analysis. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 42.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.