Benjamin H. Barton

1.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
30 papers, 591 citations indexed

About

Benjamin H. Barton is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin H. Barton has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 591 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Law, 17 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 14 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Benjamin H. Barton's work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (16 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (14 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (11 papers). Benjamin H. Barton is often cited by papers focused on Legal Education and Practice Innovations (16 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (14 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (11 papers). Benjamin H. Barton collaborates with scholars based in United States. Benjamin H. Barton's co-authors include Stephanos Bibas, Deborah L. Rhode, Emily Moran and John A. Quelch and has published in prestigious journals such as Michigan Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review and International Review of Law and Economics.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin H. Barton

22 papers receiving 537 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Measuring Poverty: A New Approach

1996 512 citations Benjamin H. Barton Michigan Law Review profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Benjamin H. Barton United States	6	307	181	162	152	77	30	591
Luis Ayala Cañón Spain	14	333 1.1×	263 1.5×	179 1.1×	91 0.6×	49 0.6×	115	673
Ajit Zacharias United States	12	297 1.0×	231 1.3×	83 0.5×	108 0.7×	70 0.9×	39	541
Daniela Vuri Italy	14	300 1.0×	357 2.0×	171 1.1×	221 1.5×	48 0.6×	50	899
Philip Merrigan Canada	11	241 0.8×	117 0.6×	168 1.0×	289 1.9×	49 0.6×	31	679
Thomas L. Hungerford United States	11	235 0.8×	406 2.2×	99 0.6×	81 0.5×	95 1.2×	55	677
Olga Cantó Spain	13	299 1.0×	169 0.9×	147 0.9×	88 0.6×	22 0.3×	32	500
Siobhan Austen Australia	14	187 0.6×	132 0.7×	144 0.9×	143 0.9×	81 1.1×	68	516
Patricia Ruggles United States	10	415 1.4×	263 1.5×	209 1.3×	334 2.2×	117 1.5×	17	736
Πάνος Τσακλόγλου Greece	19	446 1.5×	373 2.1×	210 1.3×	141 0.9×	86 1.1×	50	938
Richard Dorsett United Kingdom	13	197 0.6×	253 1.4×	209 1.3×	101 0.7×	29 0.4×	72	617

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin H. Barton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin H. Barton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin H. Barton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin H. Barton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin H. Barton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin H. Barton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin H. Barton. The network helps show where Benjamin H. Barton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin H. Barton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin H. Barton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin H. Barton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin H. Barton. Benjamin H. Barton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2019). Access to Justice and Routine Legal Services: New Technologies Meet Bar Regulators. Hastings law journal. 70(4). 955. 1 indexed citations

2.

Barton, Benjamin H. & Deborah L. Rhode. (2018). Access to Justice and Routine Legal Services: New Technologies Meet Bar Regulators. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

3.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2016). China and the European Union in Africa. 2 indexed citations

4.

Barton, Benjamin H., et al.. (2015). Middle Income Access to Justice. University of Toronto Law Journal. 65(4). 434–444.

5.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2013). The Lawyer's Monopoly — What Goes and What Stays. Fordham law review. 82(6). 3067. 7 indexed citations

6.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2013). A glass half full look at the changes in the American legal market. International Review of Law and Economics. 38. 29–42. 10 indexed citations

7.

Barton, Benjamin H. & Stephanos Bibas. (2012). Triaging Appointed-Counsel Funding and Pro Se Access to Justice. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 160(4). 967. 2 indexed citations

8.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2012). An Empirical Study of Supreme Court Justice Pre-Appointment Experience. Florida law review. 64(5). 1137. 2 indexed citations

9.

Barton, Benjamin H., et al.. (2012). It's Not Triage if the Patient Bleeds Out. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 161(1). 11.

10.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2012). An Empirical Study of Supreme Court Justice Pre-Appointment Experience. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

11.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2010). The Lawyer-Judge Bias in the American Legal System. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 15 indexed citations

12.

Quelch, John A., et al.. (2007). Creating strong businesses by developing and leveraging the productive capacity of the poor.. 167–172. 2 indexed citations

13.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2007). Do Judges Systematically Favor the Interests of the Legal Profession?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

14.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2006). Is There a Correlation between Scholarly Productivity, Scholarly Influence and Teaching Effectiveness in American Law Schools? An Empirical Study. bepress Legal Series. 1808. 1 indexed citations

15.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2005). Harry Potter and the Half-Crazed Bureaucracy. Michigan Law Review. 104(6). 1523–1538. 4 indexed citations

16.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2005). The ABA, the Rules, and Professionalism: The Mechanics of Self-Defeat and a Call for a Return to the Ethical, Moral, and Practical Approach of the Canons. North Carolina law review. 83(2). 411. 2 indexed citations

17.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2005). Tort Reform, Innovation, and Playground Design. eYLS (Yale Law School).

18.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (2004). The ABA, the Rules, and Professionalism: The Mechanics of Self-Defeat and a Call for a Return to the Ethical, Moral, and Practical Approach of the Canons. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

19.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (1996). Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Michigan Law Review. 94(6). 1993–1993. 512 indexed citations breakdown →

20.

Barton, Benjamin H.. (1995). Religion-Based Peremptory Challenges after Batson v. Kentucky and J. E. B. v. Alabama: An Equal Protection and First Amendment Analysis. Michigan Law Review. 94(1). 191–191. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact