Benjamin C. Storm

3.0k total citations
70 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Benjamin C. Storm is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin C. Storm has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 32 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 24 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Benjamin C. Storm's work include Memory Processes and Influences (55 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (18 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (14 papers). Benjamin C. Storm is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (55 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (18 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (14 papers). Benjamin C. Storm collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Benjamin C. Storm's co-authors include Elizabeth Ligon Bjork, Robert A. Bjork, Sean M. Stone, Genna Angello, Benjamin J. Levy, John F. Nestojko, Kou Murayama, Toshiya Miyatsu, Jeri L. Little and Holly White and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Psychological Science and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin C. Storm

70 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin C. Storm United States 25 1.5k 761 617 446 199 70 2.0k
Candice C. Morey United Kingdom 25 2.3k 1.6× 1.1k 1.5× 590 1.0× 188 0.4× 357 1.8× 53 3.1k
Ian Neath United States 30 2.8k 1.9× 994 1.3× 1.1k 1.8× 672 1.5× 336 1.7× 115 3.4k
Evie Vergauwe Switzerland 21 1.6k 1.0× 864 1.1× 376 0.6× 171 0.4× 219 1.1× 56 2.0k
David A. Rettinger United States 10 722 0.5× 608 0.8× 467 0.8× 196 0.4× 250 1.3× 17 2.0k
Sarah K. Tauber United States 24 1.1k 0.7× 642 0.8× 755 1.2× 303 0.7× 212 1.1× 52 1.6k
Richard Cooper United Kingdom 22 885 0.6× 358 0.5× 540 0.9× 285 0.6× 432 2.2× 96 1.7k
Jean Saint‐Aubin Canada 25 1.6k 1.1× 681 0.9× 1.2k 2.0× 436 1.0× 146 0.7× 109 2.4k
Heinz‐Martin Süß Germany 16 1.0k 0.7× 1.1k 1.5× 476 0.8× 317 0.7× 299 1.5× 35 2.0k
Gwyneth Doherty‐Sneddon United Kingdom 22 739 0.5× 516 0.7× 434 0.7× 514 1.2× 406 2.0× 42 1.9k
Géry d’Ydewalle Belgium 29 1.3k 0.9× 713 0.9× 676 1.1× 435 1.0× 263 1.3× 135 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin C. Storm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin C. Storm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin C. Storm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin C. Storm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin C. Storm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin C. Storm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin C. Storm. The network helps show where Benjamin C. Storm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin C. Storm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin C. Storm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin C. Storm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin C. Storm. Benjamin C. Storm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2024). The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved. Memory & Cognition. 52(6). 1325–1337. 4 indexed citations
2.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2023). Internet Use and Creative Thinking in the Alternative Uses Task. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 57(4). 796–811. 2 indexed citations
3.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2022). What happens to memory for lecture content when students take photos of the lecture slides?. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 12(3). 421–430. 2 indexed citations
4.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2022). Does taking multiple photos lead to a photo-taking-impairment effect?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 29(6). 2211–2218. 9 indexed citations
5.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2022). Examining the effect size and duration of retrieval-induced facilitation. Psychological Research. 87(4). 1166–1179. 4 indexed citations
6.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2021). Relearning can eliminate the effect of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Research. 86(6). 1725–1736. 3 indexed citations
7.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2021). Exploring functions of and recollections with photos in the age of smartphone cameras. Memory Studies. 15(2). 287–303. 15 indexed citations
8.
Stone, Sean M. & Benjamin C. Storm. (2019). Search fluency as a misleading measure of memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 47(1). 53–64. 21 indexed citations
9.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2018). A Consideration of the Seven Sins of Memory in the Context of Creative Cognition. Creativity Research Journal. 30(4). 402–417. 12 indexed citations
10.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2016). Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience. Memory & Cognition. 44(4). 660–670. 9 indexed citations
11.
Storm, Benjamin C. & Dung C. Bui. (2015). Retrieval-practice task affects relationship between working memory capacity and retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory. 24(10). 1407–1418. 10 indexed citations
13.
Angello, Genna, Benjamin C. Storm, & Steven M. Smith. (2014). Overcoming fixation with repeated memory suppression. Memory. 23(3). 381–389. 19 indexed citations
14.
Murayama, Kou, et al.. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting.. Psychological Bulletin. 140(5). 1383–1409. 149 indexed citations
15.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 40(6). 1594–1609. 48 indexed citations
16.
Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon & Benjamin C. Storm. (2011). Retrieval experience as a modifier of future encoding: Another test effect.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 37(5). 1113–1124. 15 indexed citations
17.
Storm, Benjamin C., Genna Angello, & Elizabeth Ligon Bjork. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: Memory dynamics in creative problem solving.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 37(5). 1287–1293. 72 indexed citations
18.
Storm, Benjamin C., et al.. (2010). Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention. Memory & Cognition. 38(2). 244–253. 71 indexed citations
19.
Storm, Benjamin C. & Arturo E. Hernández. (2007). Cognitive Consequences of Asymmetrical Visual Distraction. The Journal of General Psychology. 134(4). 415–434. 1 indexed citations
20.
Storm, Benjamin C., Elizabeth Ligon Bjork, Robert A. Bjork, & John F. Nestojko. (2006). Is retrieval success a necessary condition for retrieval-induced forgetting?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 13(6). 1023–1027. 136 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026