Benjamin Bodmer
About
In The Last Decade
Benjamin Bodmer
7 papers receiving 173 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Cognitive Neuroscience 136
- Clinical Psychology 65
- Psychiatry and Mental health 37
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 21
- Social Psychology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Bodmer
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Bodmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Bodmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Bodmer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Bodmer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Bodmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Bodmer. The network helps show where Benjamin Bodmer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Bodmer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Bodmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Bodmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Bodmer. Benjamin Bodmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 42 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.