Benjamin A. Clegg

1.8k total citations
105 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Benjamin A. Clegg is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin A. Clegg has authored 105 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Social Psychology, 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 23 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Benjamin A. Clegg's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (48 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers) and Data Visualization and Analytics (13 papers). Benjamin A. Clegg is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (48 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers) and Data Visualization and Analytics (13 papers). Benjamin A. Clegg collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Benjamin A. Clegg's co-authors include Christopher D. Wickens, Willem B. Verwey, Robert S. Gutzwiller, Steven W. Keele, Gregory J. DiGirolamo, C. A. P. Smith, Elger Abrahamse, Luis Jiménez, Angelia Sebok and Eric D. Heggestad and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Computers in Human Behavior and IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin A. Clegg

98 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin A. Clegg United States 17 602 591 217 158 101 105 1.3k
Mark St. John United States 12 314 0.5× 274 0.5× 164 0.8× 122 0.8× 56 0.6× 39 879
Thierry Baccino France 24 617 1.0× 832 1.4× 262 1.2× 502 3.2× 93 0.9× 97 2.1k
Jordan Navarro France 24 1.1k 1.9× 490 0.8× 153 0.7× 165 1.0× 57 0.6× 92 1.7k
Eva Wiese United States 20 945 1.6× 802 1.4× 99 0.5× 229 1.4× 51 0.5× 65 1.5k
Jeffrey E. Evans United States 7 298 0.5× 972 1.6× 181 0.8× 341 2.2× 192 1.9× 8 1.7k
Ben D. Sawyer United States 15 335 0.6× 170 0.3× 93 0.4× 95 0.6× 37 0.4× 54 980
Marvin J. Dainoff United States 21 713 1.2× 396 0.7× 92 0.4× 152 1.0× 34 0.3× 66 1.4k
Leanne Hirshfield United States 16 232 0.4× 453 0.8× 109 0.5× 79 0.5× 50 0.5× 50 1.3k
David E. Meyer United States 7 452 0.8× 1.2k 2.1× 241 1.1× 319 2.0× 97 1.0× 8 2.0k
Jelmer P. Borst Netherlands 21 320 0.5× 1.1k 1.8× 139 0.6× 299 1.9× 320 3.2× 70 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin A. Clegg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin A. Clegg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin A. Clegg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin A. Clegg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin A. Clegg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin A. Clegg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin A. Clegg. The network helps show where Benjamin A. Clegg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin A. Clegg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin A. Clegg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin A. Clegg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin A. Clegg. Benjamin A. Clegg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (2025). Transparent systems, opaque results: a study on automation compliance and task performance. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 10(1). 8–8.
3.
Clegg, Benjamin A., et al.. (2025). Zinc-Mediated Loading and Release of His-Tagged Recombinant Proteins in Self-Assembling Peptide Coacervates. ACS Applied Bio Materials. 9(2). 1064–1075.
4.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (2025). Clutter costs in head-mounted displays: a study examining trade-offs between overlay and adjacent presentation of information. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 10(1). 47–47.
5.
Martey, Rosa Mikeal, et al.. (2024). Mental Firewall Breached: Leveraging Cognitive Biases for Enhanced Cybersecurity. AHFE international.
6.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (2024). Quantitative effects of overlay clutter and information access effort: Examining the scan-clutter trade-off in displays with geospatial maps.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 30(4). 607–630. 1 indexed citations
7.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (2023). Effects of Color Commonality of Overlay Clutter and Information Access Effort on Tasks Requiring Visual Search. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 67(1). 650–656. 1 indexed citations
8.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (2023). Information Access Costs with a Wide-Angle Desktop Display. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 67(1). 947–952. 3 indexed citations
9.
Witt, Jessica K., et al.. (2023). Visualizing Uncertainty in Hurricane Forecasts with Animated Risk Trajectories. Weather Climate and Society. 15(2). 407–424. 2 indexed citations
11.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (2023). A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Cost and Benefits of Overlay versus Separate Displays. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 67(1). 1501–1502. 2 indexed citations
12.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (2022). How history trails and set size influence detection of hostile intentions. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 7(1). 41–41. 2 indexed citations
13.
Witt, Jessica K. & Benjamin A. Clegg. (2021). Dynamic ensemble visualizations to support understanding for uncertain trajectories.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 28(3). 451–467. 3 indexed citations
14.
Clegg, Benjamin A., et al.. (2019). Can You See It? Perceived Variance in Scatterplot Visualization. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 63(1). 1714–1718. 1 indexed citations
15.
Stromer‐Galley, Jennifer, Patrícia Rossini, Kate Kenski, et al.. (2018). User-Centered Design and Experimentation to Develop Effective Software for Evidence-Based Reasoning in the Intelligence Community: The TRACE Project. Computing in Science & Engineering. 20(6). 35–42. 2 indexed citations
16.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (2016). Time Sharing Between Robotics and Process Control. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 58(2). 322–343. 42 indexed citations
17.
Gutzwiller, Robert S., et al.. (2013). Part-Task Training in the Context of Automation: Current and Future Directions. The American Journal of Psychology. 126(4). 417–432. 7 indexed citations
18.
Clegg, Benjamin A., et al.. (2011). Tools of Critical Thinking. Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. 26(1). 62–65. 1 indexed citations
19.
Abrahamse, Elger, Luis Jiménez, Willem B. Verwey, & Benjamin A. Clegg. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 17(5). 603–623. 164 indexed citations
20.
Schmidt, Gwen L., et al.. (2008). Incidental learning of abstract rules for non-dominant word orders. Psychological Research. 73(1). 60–74. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026