Benedict Singleton

578 total citations · 1 hit paper
31 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

Benedict Singleton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Geography, Planning and Development. According to data from OpenAlex, Benedict Singleton has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Geography, Planning and Development. Recurrent topics in Benedict Singleton's work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (7 papers) and Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers). Benedict Singleton is often cited by papers focused on Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (7 papers) and Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers). Benedict Singleton collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom. Benedict Singleton's co-authors include Rolf Lidskog, Eva Gustavsson, Monika Berg, Erik Hysing, Karin Gustafsson, Jan Olsson, Maria Ojala, Erik Andersson, Magnus Boström and Erik Löfmarck and has published in prestigious journals such as Sustainability, AMBIO and Cities.

In The Last Decade

Benedict Singleton

28 papers receiving 340 citations

Hit Papers

Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable De... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benedict Singleton Sweden 10 116 115 96 57 40 31 363
Emma Lee Australia 9 145 1.3× 117 1.0× 57 0.6× 95 1.7× 27 0.7× 31 445
Erik Löfmarck Sweden 10 113 1.0× 110 1.0× 132 1.4× 203 3.6× 22 0.6× 14 488
Matthew Birnbaum United States 10 65 0.6× 60 0.5× 49 0.5× 27 0.5× 23 0.6× 23 284
Sandra Wooltorton Australia 11 69 0.6× 121 1.1× 76 0.8× 17 0.3× 22 0.6× 40 311
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo 7 88 0.8× 138 1.2× 42 0.4× 34 0.6× 17 0.4× 32 407
Bill Gould United Kingdom 7 143 1.2× 130 1.1× 162 1.7× 37 0.6× 19 0.5× 15 413
Laura Lindenfeld United States 14 218 1.9× 42 0.4× 81 0.8× 118 2.1× 29 0.7× 38 468
Adam C. Landon United States 13 171 1.5× 83 0.7× 151 1.6× 101 1.8× 9 0.2× 19 494
Elin Kelsey Canada 7 93 0.8× 65 0.6× 160 1.7× 29 0.5× 11 0.3× 13 241
Elisa Bignante Italy 9 136 1.2× 20 0.2× 42 0.4× 79 1.4× 37 0.9× 21 353

Countries citing papers authored by Benedict Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benedict Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benedict Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benedict Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benedict Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benedict Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benedict Singleton. The network helps show where Benedict Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benedict Singleton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benedict Singleton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benedict Singleton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benedict Singleton. Benedict Singleton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Singleton, Benedict. (2024). ‘It’s always on’. Rituals and social structure within an international touch rugby team. Sport in Society. 27(11). 1707–1728.
2.
Singleton, Benedict, et al.. (2023). Mutiny on the Boundary? Examining ILK-Based Conservation Collaborations through the Lens of Rubbish Theory. Ethnobiology Letters. 14(2). 1 indexed citations
3.
Singleton, Benedict, et al.. (2023). Doing Conservation Differently: Toward a Diverse Conservations Inventory. Ethnobiology Letters. 14(2). 2 indexed citations
4.
Singleton, Benedict. (2023). Swedish bureaucratic biodiversity: Analysing municipal worker discourse with the theory of sociocultural viability. Environmental Policy and Governance. 34(4). 400–413. 1 indexed citations
5.
Singleton, Benedict. (2023). Viewpoint: Two more lamps. Augmenting urban planning for biodiversity. Cities. 141. 104501–104501. 4 indexed citations
7.
Singleton, Benedict, et al.. (2022). Uncomfortable Knowledge: Toward a Pedagogy of Reflexivity. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 11(2). 73–85. 4 indexed citations
8.
Singleton, Benedict, et al.. (2021). Toward productive complicity: Applying ‘traditional ecological knowledge’ in environmental science. The Anthropocene Review. 10(2). 393–414. 20 indexed citations
9.
Singleton, Benedict, et al.. (2021). Intersectionality and climate policy-making: The inclusion of social difference by three Swedish government agencies. Environment and Planning C Politics and Space. 40(1). 180–200. 19 indexed citations
10.
Singleton, Benedict. (2020). Interpreting taskscapes: the rituals of guided Nature-Based (Dis)Integration in Sweden. Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research. 34(1). 111–131. 5 indexed citations
11.
Singleton, Benedict. (2020). “We Offer Nuffle a Sausage Sacrifice on Game Day”. Blood Bowl Players’ World-building Rituals through the Lens of Theory of Sociocultual Viability. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 50(2). 176–201. 2 indexed citations
12.
Singleton, Benedict. (2019). The Wake of the Whale: Hunter Societies in the Caribbean and North Atlantic. Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)). 5 indexed citations
13.
Boström, Magnus, Erik Andersson, Monika Berg, et al.. (2018). Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Review and Approach. Sustainability. 10(12). 4479–4479. 179 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Singleton, Benedict. (2017). What’s missing from Ostrom? Combining design principles with the theory of sociocultural viability. Environmental Politics. 26(6). 994–1014. 24 indexed citations
15.
Singleton, Benedict, et al.. (2017). Inclusive hunting: examining Faroese whaling using the theory of socio-cultural viability. MAST. Maritime studies/Maritime studies. 16(1). 6 indexed citations
16.
Singleton, Benedict. (2016). Framing a Supermantra: Ecotourism, Engagement and Conceptualisations of ‘Good’ Development. Forum for Development Studies. 43(3). 463–487. 11 indexed citations
17.
Singleton, Benedict & Gary Fry. (2015). Citizen Carer: Carer's Allowance and Conceptualisations of UK Citizenship. Journal of Social Policy. 44(3). 549–566. 8 indexed citations
18.
Singleton, Benedict. (2015). Clumsiness and elegance in environmental management: applying cultural theory to the history of whaling. Environmental Politics. 25(3). 414–433. 13 indexed citations
19.
Toomey, Michael & Benedict Singleton. (2014). The Post‐9/11 “Terrorism” Discourse and Its Impact on Nonstate Actors: A Comparative Study of the LTTE and Hamas. Asian Politics & Policy. 6(2). 183–198. 1 indexed citations
20.
Fry, Gary, et al.. (2011). Developing a clearer understanding of the Carer’s Allowance claimant group. Örebro University Library (Örebro University). 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026